![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The "glass jaw" effect for the P-40 seems to carry through not just to the old "late P-40"models, but also into the somewhat newer Hawk 81/P-40C models (although the cockpit modeling is a huge improvement in the P-40C model - the P-40M's cockpit has big dark posts which really interfere with forward visibility and the gauges are hard to read). Just now, I found myself getting shot to pieces in a P-40C by a bunch of rookie Ki-21 gunners. Single rifle caliber MG hits, usually taking hits from dead ahead so the engine block and cockpit armor is in the way of the shots, yet the P-40 consistently gets some combination of aileron, elevator and/or elevator controls destroyed, which is extremely improbable. Additionally, I've notice that hits from head on somehow shred the rudder! Realistically, the only part of the vertical stabilizer assembly that could possible get damaged from a head-on shot is the leading edge, yet the damage model shows my entire rudder surface being shredded! Strange that a) that part gets hit as often as it does, b) that the damage model doesn't show damage to the vertical stabilizer and not just the control surfaces. Quote:
Overall, it seems like "X controls destroyed" hits are far too common given the size of control runs relative to the rest of the plane and the fact that there were often redundant systems. Likewise, it seems that badly damaged engines shut down way to fast. It seems strange that a machine which weighs hundreds of pounds and produces hundreds of HP of torque would instantly stop spinning, especially when the drive shaft is several inches thick and mostly encased within the engine block. This effect is particularly pronounced in the Bf-109 where the engine will sometimes just stop when you get hit. No screech and whine from a tortured engine before it dies. It just stops. Quote:
Quote:
But, at least we no longer have to worry about options that basically boil down to: "This was Western propaganda; lies just put in the pilot's manual and numerous technical reports in order to give the deluded capitalist running dog stooge pilots false confidence in their completely inferior equipment." or, "This Soviet technical report, based on a clapped-out airplane assembled and maintained by mechanics who'd never seen the plane before, flown using 87 octane gas diluted with yak urine, is the definitive word on this plane's performance." I hope this time it will be different. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don t know if this is a bug...
Friday nigth coop with my squad, Berlin campaign. About 16/18 pilots online plus several AIs. wheather: fog Massive freeze. We were flyng these campaing for about 20 missions or more, with 4.12/4.12.1. It wasn´t a connection issue, we all got green squares, suddendly it locks for a few pilots, then, after a few seconds, all got freeze. We guessed it was the weather and the heavy map, but it was weird, so, we have to report it, maybe it´s something related to the patch. PD: Bomb delay not saved still present.
__________________
Bombing smurfs since a long time ago... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More about the P-40 series.
Despite being described as a plane with "no vices" (Caldwell) it seems to be very difficult to recover from a high speed spin even when applying proper technique to stop it (kill throttle, full opposite rudder). This despite the pilot's manual (here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/117829198/...-40-Warhawk-WW) stating that it should be possible to recover from a spin within 2 turns and 1-2,000 feet (~330-660 meters) loss of altitude. They don't say whether it's a low or high speed spin, however. While it's for an earlier model, the pilot's notes for the Tomahawk (http://www.456fis.org/P-40_PILOT_MANUAL.htm) indicate that the plane should come out of the spin unless held. This seems different from my experience. Using arcade mode, I'm noticing that I'm getting pilot kill hits from rifle-caliber MG shots directly from ahead or behind (through the front of the cockpit or fuselage), despite the fact that all but the Hawk 81/P-40A-B/Kittyhawk series the P-40 had armor or armor glass in those areas. (1.5 inches of armor glass, 7 mm of armor below the cockpit combing down to the engine block, 7 mm behind the pilot. The pilot's seat wasn't armored, however.) Additionally, any hit to the front of the engine through the prop boss instantly (or nearly instantly) kills the engine. Any hit from the front through the radiator housing kills the oil/cooling system, resulting in engine shutdown within about a minute. While this is legitimate, it's possible that the damage boxes for the cooler system are larger than they were in real life (see diagrams in the pilot's manual). Reading maintenance manuals for the P-40, it appears that the coolant assemblies got slightly larger in later models but the oil cooler got smaller. The P-40D & E models have a frontal coolant radiator surface area of 1.11 square feet. The P-40F model has a frontal coolant radiator surface of 1.75 feet. The oil cooler is 95 square inches on the D & E models, 35 square inches on the F. I'm still hunting on info about the armor around the P-40's engine. Also, for a time U.S. P-40s in the U.S. were using 91 or 92 octane gas to preserve the 100 octane gas for flights in combat zones. I've seen, but can't find, comparative numbers for P-40 performance using both 100 and 91/92 octane fuel. It would be nice if it was possible to choose your fuel type, and it would definitely reduce arguments regarding aircraft performance. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Old bug, dunno whether reported before:
Normandy map, near Caen, to the South of Louvigny, at 76.5:59.1, a wrong object, a vehicular road bridge is connecting two rail sections, making East-West rail traffic practically impossible for the whole Caen region. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I guess that they don't help the traffic... ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Very clever Maquis, to replace a road bridge with a railroad bridge and to make buildings straddle the rail line, rather than just using dynamite! ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Again Kursk map:
Quadrant E7 near Dimitriev-Logovskiy - there is a road bridge where a rail bridge should be. This makes the western part of the railroad network pretty useless. Quadrant F3 near Lgov - rails across a river without a bridge - not tested if trains will drive across despite that. Quadrant I3 there is a railway crossing with a road, but instead of going across the road, there is a gap in the rails. Now the western part of the railroad network is totally useless. I'm a bit astonished noone ever discovered this or if so it wasn't corrected |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I always found it funny that P-51, P-40, Bf-109 got damaged engines with overheat and loss of power when hit or instantly died with a good burst of fire but the P-39's have no noticeable loss of power and usually can fly 10+ minutes at full combat capability smoking a lot.
Even when they have almost the same engine and amount of oil than a P-51 and P-40, lots of oil tubes around the engine that you easily perforate meanwhile doing other damage to the engine from a 6 o clock firing position. |
![]() |
|
|