Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2012, 02:30 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VO101_Tom View Post
The simulator will not be worse because of the ground stuff become driveable. This is an extra feature. If you don't like it, it's ok, but who's care? Then you don't use it, and done. Why do you think that things can not be developed simultaneously? The core programming and these are two separate part of the game, the guy (guys) who programmed the memory leak problem, still working on their own tasks...
Yeah, right?

I love it when people want to deny other peoples` options.
  #2  
Old 02-24-2012, 02:45 PM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Yeah, right?

I love it when people want to deny other peoples` options.
You lost nothing if the ground stuff become playable, and win nothing if don't. However, if the developers abandoned the project because many people are opposed to this, who want to use, it will not be able to. I do not understand why this would be good to those who now complain.
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
  #3  
Old 02-24-2012, 03:05 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VO101_Tom View Post
You lost nothing if the ground stuff become playable, and win nothing if don't. However, if the developers abandoned the project because many people are opposed to this, who want to use, it will not be able to. I do not understand why this would be good to those who now complain.
Sorry mate. I wholeheartedly agree with you! I mean the complainers deny us to have options
  #4  
Old 02-24-2012, 03:39 PM
VO101_Tom's Avatar
VO101_Tom VO101_Tom is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 799
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
Sorry mate. I wholeheartedly agree with you! I mean the complainers deny us to have options
Yes yes, I know. Sorry if it was ambiguous. I was not angry at you, but the others.
__________________
| AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu

i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940
Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
  #5  
Old 02-24-2012, 04:40 PM
BaronBonBaron BaronBonBaron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: MI, USA
Posts: 89
Default

Thank you!
Very nice video, I really like the direction the series is going!

Now... where is that Beta patch?!!
  #6  
Old 02-24-2012, 08:51 PM
322Sqn_Dusty's Avatar
322Sqn_Dusty 322Sqn_Dusty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 214
Default Ground vehicles

Personally I don't mind tanks or other ground vehicles, they can give the ground wars another dimension inside the world of Il2. I like the mannable AAA/FLAK in combination with the flatbed wagons or field deployment (great for missions). For me ClOD and the runner up are in the first place about combat flying.

As for now I still dislike the way Clod runs, the ai and comms aren't the way it should be, yes work in progress.. I know. Get rid of the crippled planes in the multiplayer games, the way you sign up for the game still feels less as in 1946.

For the optimalization. After buying a SSD and more RAM, CloD runs a bit better, still no joy with 4890 in crossfire, I won't invest in a new graphic card with 2Gb or more right now because of the € and with other games it works and shows it's power potential. CloD itself has a huge potential, the dynamic weather and the scripting are what we could expect, it will hit my system when it's operational though.

Just keep working on it.... it takes time to make perfect.
__________________
Q9550 @ 3.4
Coolermaster 850w PSu
Sapphire HD6970 2GB
8Gb Ram B.Dragon
Kingston SSD
Win 7 64
Logitech G940
Saitek Quadrant


Last edited by 322Sqn_Dusty; 02-24-2012 at 09:07 PM. Reason: Removed some dislikes...
  #7  
Old 02-24-2012, 09:04 PM
Stipe Stipe is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 70
Default

Those of us who enjoy SEOW with the old Il-2 know why this update is awesome. I can understand why it doesn't appeal to the lovers of mindless Quake style dogfights.
Just make the option "Follow me" for the commander tank.
  #8  
Old 02-24-2012, 03:06 PM
TheEditor TheEditor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 221
Default

Think about it... If you don't like tanks, don't use them. If the kids are in them online then we bomb the $hlT out of them! Sounds like a win to me.

All in all, the benchmarks that B6 hinted at is what I was hoping to see.

You look at 1C other game forums here? There dead much like those games. 1C should pool all there resources from those games to CloD so we have a MMO with or without the monthly fee.

I play EVE and came back here and check how the game is. I'm glad the devs are back to updating us.

But really, some of you people need to pick up a different game/hobby and quit sounding like your life is over because you didn't get 100 octane fuel.
  #9  
Old 02-24-2012, 03:07 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEditor View Post
Think about it... If you don't like tanks, don't use them. If the kids are in them online then we bomb the $hlT out of them! Sounds like a win to me.
+1
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.