![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
I can not understand what the "ETA"? Infantry - this is a very heavy load on the engine and FPS, it's a big question. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Estimated time of arrival, B6
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
2) out of the car - not sure most likely it will be done in the same way as the transition from the plane to the plane Thank you) It all depends on the programmers, perhaps in the next few days. Ilya still does not say anything to me about it... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Recruiting Soon! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry but i cant believe that this is an update info of an incoming patch of a flight sim... sorry again.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Do you guys really think (it's a serious question) that a Game/Sim could satisfy plane AND tank enthusiasts?
If I think on Tiger Vs. T34 - all the stuff like DM, sound, physics in a Flightsim on a nowadays rig? No way if you ask me... however I hope that they'll make a perfect flightsim and add some tanks and stuff to sell more copies of the game. If this is satisfying for tank fans is a whole other story though... |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
IMO the answer is no. Sadly.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why complain so much? The game as it is now is way better then anything out there. Any other dev that got their product shoved out the door would just leave the mess and walk away. Just be happy it was made at all. And be even more happy that they are providing patches. Then cry with tears of joy when you realize they are providing you weekly updates with what is going on.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you for the update.
If the ground vehicle aspects were a third party (or even in house) addon at a later stage with a fettled game I would support them. As it is the current position gives me real concern as to the direction the development is going in. As to fundamental realism aspects like tree collision I am encouraged that it will be addressed but again, when things like that are missing and i'm watching a tank battle in the game I've got to wonder if the priorities are right here. Anyway, back to lurking. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks B6 - exciting times me thinks.
__________________
Intel Core i7 2600 3.4 GHz | 1GB Gainward GTX 460 GS | Corsair 4GB XMS3 PC3-12800 1600MHz (1x4GB) | Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3P B3 (Intel P67) | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 BIT | 600W PSU | 1 TB SATA-II HDD 7200 32MB | 22" Samsung T220 screen. |
![]() |
|
|