Rebalancing of tanks needed!

[Nikitns]

Originally Posted by Crni vuk

equal armor on the side like the front? That would be quite bad if I got you right here.

~ though I noticed the T34/85 hull is quite resistant to the Panzer IV H. To resistant as the T34/85 had literaly the same armor values compared to the T34/76. And those could be destroyed by the panzer IV H succesfully on all distances regardless the angle. Sadly in Men of War, I never have reasons to fear the Panzer IV as its gun isnt even close to the pentration it should have.

1. Early T-34/76 was built as a versatile tank. Not only an anti tank weapon. It was also built for attacking, fighting in cities et cetra so having decent side and back armour would be pretty useful.
2. T-34/85 had significantly upgraded armour.
3. Panzer 4H is fine. Realistically the T-34/85 and Panzer 4H were pretty equal from what I've heard. While I would prefer a Panzer 4H over a T-34/85 (a bit better gun, cheaper) I never buy Panzer 4H. U could buy a much stronger Hetzer for the price of a Panzer 4H. Just like I rather buy Kv-85 than a T-34/85.

T-34's could be taken out from the front pretty easily by Panzer 4H's. I believe T-34/85 only has 60mm or so frontal armour, so the Panzer 4H should take 1 out at 80-90 meters.