Sniper MGFF

[TomcatViP]

JA that is my point !

we need a fixed % as a limit.

Pls note that I am a 109 driver too (50/50 109 & Hurri)

[TomcatViP]

He he I am not saying that I do not want to dye but only that the rate of Pk seems way out of proportion.

I am not finger pointing any category of player that can aim better than myself. Pls be sure of that.

However it could be interesting to link the number of sniper ammo available in any belt like the AP round to the effective kill ratio of the player (until pilot death) to emulate the foggy vision the Luftwaffe had of a democracy.

~S!

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

the rate of Pk seems way out of proportion

It's out of proportion in comparison to what data?

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by cheesehawk

I dunno about who has better aim, or if one belt is so much more viable than any other. My 109 belt currently is:

...

I found that if I put the observer and/or tracer rounds at the beginning of the belt for one gun and the end of the belt for another gun it makes it a little easier to aim. Try it out. Instead of two simultaneous tracers you have them alternating out of each gun.

With the observer rounds it probably won't make as much of a difference but it might make observer strikes more evenly distributed.

Flying tactically will solve any advantages someone might have with their ammo. Staying out from in front of their guns is a bigger deal to me than what they load their guns with!

This was the point I was trying to make earlier in the thread.

[CaptainDoggles]

[TomcatViP]

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

It's out of proportion in comparison to what data?

Have you read me so far ?

pls take a look of the above. (3pk in less than an hour (100% odds vs 3% as"calculated") each time the first bullet flew right in the head (what I call Pk then hit)

Damn do I need an automate to write further in this thread ? (see the new Tc&Vip bellow)

[drewpee]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

Have you read me so far ?

pls take a look of the above. (3pk in less than an hour (100% odds vs 3% as"calculated") each time the first bullet flew right in the head (what I call Pk then hit)

Damn do I need an automate to write further in this thread ?

Soooo you got shot in the head rite?

[TomcatViP]

Originally Posted by drewpee

Soooo you got shot in the head rite?

Yeah . do you think this has any effect on my vision of things ...

Where is Raiiid ? We need his advice here

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

Have you read me so far ?

pls take a look of the above. (3pk in less than an hour (100% odds vs 3% as"calculated") each time the first bullet flew right in the head (what I call Pk then hit)

Damn do I need an automate to write further in this thread ? (see the new Tc&Vip bellow)

Either you don't understand the concepts of probability and odds, or you are being misleading.

Getting 3 PKs in an hour does not magically make it "100% odds of getting a PK".

[Varrattu]

I agree with TomcatViP, it is impossible to kill a pilot three times in one hour! One head shot was actually enough to kill a pilot for his whole life.

Happy hunting

Varrattu