Sniper MGFF

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

the rate of Pk seems way out of proportion

It's out of proportion in comparison to what data?

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by cheesehawk

I dunno about who has better aim, or if one belt is so much more viable than any other. My 109 belt currently is:

...

I found that if I put the observer and/or tracer rounds at the beginning of the belt for one gun and the end of the belt for another gun it makes it a little easier to aim. Try it out. Instead of two simultaneous tracers you have them alternating out of each gun.

With the observer rounds it probably won't make as much of a difference but it might make observer strikes more evenly distributed.

Flying tactically will solve any advantages someone might have with their ammo. Staying out from in front of their guns is a bigger deal to me than what they load their guns with!

This was the point I was trying to make earlier in the thread.

[CaptainDoggles]

[TomcatViP]

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

It's out of proportion in comparison to what data?

Have you read me so far ?

pls take a look of the above. (3pk in less than an hour (100% odds vs 3% as"calculated") each time the first bullet flew right in the head (what I call Pk then hit)

Damn do I need an automate to write further in this thread ? (see the new Tc&Vip bellow)

[drewpee]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

Have you read me so far ?

pls take a look of the above. (3pk in less than an hour (100% odds vs 3% as"calculated") each time the first bullet flew right in the head (what I call Pk then hit)

Damn do I need an automate to write further in this thread ?

Soooo you got shot in the head rite?

[TomcatViP]

Originally Posted by drewpee

Soooo you got shot in the head rite?

Yeah . do you think this has any effect on my vision of things ...

Where is Raiiid ? We need his advice here

[CaptainDoggles]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

Have you read me so far ?

pls take a look of the above. (3pk in less than an hour (100% odds vs 3% as"calculated") each time the first bullet flew right in the head (what I call Pk then hit)

Damn do I need an automate to write further in this thread ? (see the new Tc&Vip bellow)

Either you don't understand the concepts of probability and odds, or you are being misleading.

Getting 3 PKs in an hour does not magically make it "100% odds of getting a PK".

[Varrattu]

I agree with TomcatViP, it is impossible to kill a pilot three times in one hour! One head shot was actually enough to kill a pilot for his whole life.

Happy hunting

Varrattu

[drewpee]

OK I must admit one nite on the Repka islands of doom server wile flying a 109, I was flying in the vertical and recking havoc on the fellers flying Spits and Hurrys. That was until some traitor in a 109 with RAF markings PK'd me 3 times in a row. The thing is every time I didn't think ether of use had a guns solution. I did manage to bring him down and IMA my flight skills were superior to his.
Any how I just put it down to luck or maybe a lag issue but must admit I thought at the time maybe he had some sort of cheat enabled. It was only the one time and I haven't had a run of PKs since. If it is a cheat it's not wide spread.

[TomcatViP]

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

Either you don't understand the concepts of probability and odds, or you are being misleading.

Getting 3 PKs in an hour does not magically make it "100% odds of getting a PK".

Really ? 3 out of 3 does not makes 100% here ?

Damn do I hve to dig out my old Ti57 for that

(just to make some fun out of this thread)