|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
| View Poll Results: How happy are you with the current state of COD terrain? | |||
| Very Happy - the terrain is currently excellent and requires little or no change |
   
|
16 | 6.37% |
| Generally Happy - the terrain is good, but there is room for improvement |
  
|
140 | 55.78% |
| Generally Unhappy - the terrain is poor, and requires significant work to be done |
  
|
62 | 24.70% |
| Very Unhappy - the terrain is so bad that it makes me reluctant to fly a mission |
  
|
33 | 13.15% |
| Voters: 251. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#27
07-14-2011, 09:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Nice comparison shots FS~Phat. It just reinforces my belief that i don't really miss much by dropping a few settings to medium in exchange for a smooth 25-60 FPS (capped at 60 due to Vsync) under any kind of scenario on my two year old PC.
I'm not saying it's the same and sure, people with an eye for detail will spot differences but to be perfectly honest with you all, i just don't see it. Maybe if i start looking really carefully i'll see it, but then it defeats the purpose as i won't be scrutinizing the landscape that hard when i'm actually flying. The only settings i'd want to be able to run higher are forests and building detail and that's just for the eye-candy factor, i run them on low and houses/buildings are a bit sparse on detail but then again, i don't really notice unless i'm skimming rooftops or crash landing next to a farm. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode