Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: How happy are you with the current state of COD terrain?
Very Happy - the terrain is currently excellent and requires little or no change 16 6.37%
Generally Happy - the terrain is good, but there is room for improvement 140 55.78%
Generally Unhappy - the terrain is poor, and requires significant work to be done 62 24.70%
Very Unhappy - the terrain is so bad that it makes me reluctant to fly a mission 33 13.15%
Voters: 251. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 07-13-2011, 11:38 AM
flyingblind flyingblind is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 255
Default

Given the constraints imposed by computer resource limitations I don't think the landscape is too bad. Field textures and colour are not that far out apart from modern crop spraying tracks in some of the fields which, given the amount of work needed to remove, are no doubt there to stay. English hedges, or at least the impression of them, could do with improvement. Again trees are always going to be limited by computer resources and as they stand they lack much variation. Back in the 40s the predominant tree was the English Elm, very dark and imposing, which made the landscape look like a typical Constable painting.They were pretty well wiped out in the 70s by Dutch Elm Beetle. I think the biggest improvement that can and probably will be made is the water and particularly the shore line. The mud flats of the Thames Estuary and The Wash are almost as iconic as the White Cliffs. I think it was said in a post by Luthier that water will be transparent so maybe they will come to life a bit. Have a look at Google Maps and Google Earth to get an idea of how they should look. So all in all I am one of the majority and checked button 2.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 07-13-2011, 11:52 AM
RCAF_FB_Orville RCAF_FB_Orville is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
Posts: 341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
"just leave it at that"? Seriously?

Where the #¤#% did i call anyone a pig? I called someone a pig and then deleted it? U know, i saw u admit to being an avid fan of Sim City last week, but then u deleted it. What should i do? And good luck disproving me btw.

But go right ahead and accuse me of things that never happened if you want to go down that route.

And dont tell me, im still the one who has to watch his manners?

This forum is getting freakier and freakier by the minute.

And just so u know, i have no opinion of u what so ever, but where u get your "personal" stuff from is beyond me.
Actually you are right baron and I apologise, I'm typing this on a tiny screen, and doing 3 things at once.... I just mixed you up with baronwastelan....so my mistake and sorry. It was not you at all but him. I write baron short for baronwastelan too to save time, its my bad mate and not directed at you at all.

Okey dokey.

Last edited by RCAF_FB_Orville; 07-13-2011 at 12:00 PM. Reason: Addendum
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:04 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCAF_FB_Orville View Post
Actually you are right baron and I apologise, I'm typing this on a tiny screen, and doing 3 things at once.... I just mixed you up with baronwastelan....so my mistake and sorry. It was not you at all but him. I write baron short for baronwastelan too to save time, its my bad mate and not directed at you at all.

Okey dokey.

NP, i thought as much and for everyone's sake lets get back on topic.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:23 PM
palker4 palker4 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 94
Default

I chose very unhappy cause whenever i come close to a larger area of terrain the game will crash always
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 07-13-2011, 12:42 PM
Rattlehead Rattlehead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
This forum is getting freakier and freakier by the minute.
We need another Chuck Norris thread. Lighten the mood a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 07-13-2011, 01:05 PM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

would you all vote in my texture sizes poll please. http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=24486
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 07-13-2011, 01:39 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattlehead View Post
We need another Chuck Norris thread. Lighten the mood a bit.

Said, based on a misunderstanding.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 07-14-2011, 02:46 AM
Tiger27 Tiger27 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by palker4 View Post
I chose very unhappy cause whenever i come close to a larger area of terrain the game will crash always
Therefore invalidating the whole process, only joking, but I think the poll was more about whether you liked the look of it or not, jsut a question have you deleted your cache?

The other thing may be if you are running winXP, CoD and Win XP are not on friendly terms.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 07-14-2011, 03:13 AM
Heliocon Heliocon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 651
Default

IMHO terrain texture resolutions are way too low, it looks like a smudgy mess. Colors as other have pointed out are to some degree off, but I can live with that.

Worst thing so far is the building popup/grey texture at a distance. Its embarrasingly ugly.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 07-14-2011, 04:38 AM
FS~Phat FS~Phat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 609
Default

Im trying to spread the word that the best trade off I have found is turning landscape to medium as it appears to reduce draw distance by maybe 20-30% for some land based objects. This smooths out all texture hiccups even when running everything else maxed on my system.

I would rather have a little less draw distance for land objects and higher quality textures than the insane draw distance you get with Landscape on High.

Can other people try Landscape on Medium and report their findings, both visual and performance wise?

Last edited by FS~Phat; 07-14-2011 at 01:38 PM. Reason: edit did some a-b comparisons its about 20-30% reduced
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.