Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-06-2011, 04:44 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPickle View Post
yes but its the branches dave, look you cant ignore it lol cos its true. Go outside your house and look at how the trees braches knit with trees close together creating a dense look, no how do you think its gonna look at height?
Are you now complaining that CoD trees don't have enough branches?

Look, I have had enough. The post with the WoP screenshot, CoD screenshot, and actual photo pretty much says it all. If you expect the CoD devs to make that game look more like WoP in any way, you are not going to be happy. WoP looks like crap. If you like it, that's great, but anyone looking at that post realizes immediately that CoD is closer to the real photo. If you are counting tree branches, then you are just desperate, and there is no point to responding to you. If you have any other points you'd like to make, just look at page 47 of this thread. It is my response to anything further you have to say on this subject.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-06-2011, 04:48 PM
BigPickle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Are you now complaining that CoD trees don't have enough branches?

Look, I have had enough. The post with the WoP screenshot, CoD screenshot, and actual photo pretty much says it all. If you expect the CoD devs to make that game look more like WoP in any way, you are not going to be happy. WoP looks like crap. If you like it, that's great, but anyone looking at that post realizes immediately that CoD is closer to the real photo. If you are counting tree branches, then you are just desperate, and there is no point to responding to you. If you have any other points you'd like to make, just look at page 47 of this thread. It is my response to anything further you have to say on this subject.
No dave im not complaining about about trees not having enough branches, your complaining about me thinking thats what I'm saying.
I'm saying that the trees are two sparcely placed so increase the branches or place them closer together to make it look more dense.

Oh and nearly forgot :
Quote:
Do you actually think I care if you ignore me? That's pretty funny
As quoted by you.

Quote:
Nice, you ignorant little sh*t.
As quoted by Alan Partridge

Last edited by BigPickle; 05-06-2011 at 04:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-2011, 04:49 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Page 47.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-06-2011, 04:49 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

OK David, that's fine. I mean, you really are in a minority here. It's clear in the CoD pictures that there is a lack of hedgerows, there are too many randomly placed trees than is necessary, and also the trees should be neatly arranged in patches of wood-land and forest.

WoP models the neat look of the countryside very well. COlours and such are another matter entirely.

Cod models the fields and colours nicely (maybe the textures could be slightly better in quality).

That's all from me. I mean, personally, I wouldn't ask an American to explain my country, so really your posts don't hold a lot of water to me. I'm not being rude, just honest.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-2011, 04:58 PM
Dano Dano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield UK
Posts: 1,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
OK David, that's fine. I mean, you really are in a minority here. It's clear in the CoD pictures that there is a lack of hedgerows, there are too many randomly placed trees than is necessary, and also the trees should be neatly arranged in patches of wood-land and forest.

WoP models the neat look of the countryside very well. COlours and such are another matter entirely.

Cod models the fields and colours nicely (maybe the textures could be slightly better in quality).
Spot on in my opinion, and out of the two I prefer the look of CoD by a long way.
__________________
i5 2500k - Asus P8P67Pro - Crucial M4 64GB - 8GB DDR3 - Geforce Ti 560 1GB - Xonar DG - W7 X64 SP1
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-06-2011, 04:51 PM
Sauf Sauf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 436
Default

I think with all our expectations being raised over time that we do forget it is primarly a COMBAT sim, which it does exceptionally well, if we can get smooth game/flight play I can live with whatever the ground looks like tbh.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-06-2011, 05:07 PM
SsSsSsSsSnake SsSsSsSsSnake is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: England
Posts: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauf View Post
I think with all our expectations being raised over time that we do forget it is primarly a COMBAT sim, which it does exceptionally well, if we can get smooth game/flight play I can live with whatever the ground looks like tbh.
Like WOP?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-06-2011, 05:24 PM
Sauf Sauf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 436
Default

Hi Snake, and no offense intended, but I have flown with online squads using only full real, on and off for the last 5 years of il2, I did buy WOP after a break from flying (working away from home for 16 months on and off) as I thought a change would be good, Played it for half a day and never looked at it since, something I would give my 9 year old boy to play with to teach him the basics of flight dynamics. Also downloaded ROF demo and gave that a shot but couldnt get into it, though that may have been more to the limited game play with the demo than the game itself. Way things are going might have to try it again.

PS, will gladly meet up with you online one day mate to have a fly around as your wingman, you can show me the sights of Kent. S`

Last edited by Sauf; 05-06-2011 at 05:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-06-2011, 05:49 PM
SsSsSsSsSnake SsSsSsSsSnake is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: England
Posts: 288
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauf View Post
Hi Snake, and no offense intended, but I have flown with online squads using only full real, on and off for the last 5 years of il2, I did buy WOP after a break from flying (working away from home for 16 months on and off) as I thought a change would be good, Played it for half a day and never looked at it since, something I would give my 9 year old boy to play with to teach him the basics of flight dynamics. Also downloaded ROF demo and gave that a shot but couldnt get into it, though that may have been more to the limited game play with the demo than the game itself. Way things are going might have to try it again.

PS, will gladly meet up with you online one day mate to have a fly around as your wingman, you can show me the sights of Kent. S`
~S~ Sauf
No offence taken i wasnt trying to say WOP is a better simulator in the FM etc just that it looks more like Kent to me than does COD and I really want COD to be a good immersive game but the land colour and layout spoils the immersion whereas when im flying over kent in WOP with Trackir it looks more like the kent Countryside. thanks for the offer of winging but I think the roles should be the other way round.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-06-2011, 04:52 PM
Houndstone Hawk Houndstone Hawk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sat in front the PC
Posts: 272
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hayward View Post
Are you now complaining that CoD trees don't have enough branches?

Look, I have had enough. The post with the WoP screenshot, CoD screenshot, and actual photo pretty much says it all. If you expect the CoD devs to make that game look more like WoP in any way, you are not going to be happy. WoP looks like crap. If you like it, that's great, but anyone looking at that post realizes immediately that CoD is closer to the real photo. If you are counting tree branches, then you are just desperate, and there is no point to responding to you. If you have any other points you'd like to make, just look at page 47 of this thread. It is my response to anything further you have to say on this subject.
"Crap", "Puke", "Shit".
Maybe a good thing you're going to refrain from the debate.
I think the other poster (the one, like everyone else, not using spoilt-kid playground descriptions) has a very fair point though in that the FSAA & general unoptimization of COD is more to blame than the game design. Things are only going to get better.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.