![]() |
CoD vs some other sims that model Kent?
Did one of these comparisons when the first landscape shots of CoD arrived to I thought a revisit with the current version would be interesting as I've read some people that are discontent with CoD that said they where going back to FSX, X-Plane, WoP etc....
So let's compare apples and pears? FSX on max: http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/4...ofdoverfsx.jpg CoD on high (on my old rig with no stuttering and rather OK fluid fps - better than FSX!): http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/3...ofdovercod.jpg Ohh - and then we have the bunch that say that WoP has so much better graphics than CoD (which they claim does not look much better than IL2). Lets test that? CoD (aka "the real Deal"?): http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/903...herealdeal.jpg WoP: http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/6...pcomparev3.jpg And add IL2 (pimped): http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/3...2comparev2.jpg |
sorry il2 is better for me
486 DX2 66mhz 4MB ram S3 Virge |
Nice!
Makes you realize how good this game actually is (can be ;) ). |
Quote:
|
WoP has those horrible filters, but the shape and definition of the fields and patches of woodland looks MUCH better than CloD.
I think this is a fairer representation of FSX; the South East England scenery pack: The onlt one to get the colours about right. http://i1-games.softpedia-static.com...-England_1.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
S!
Take the screens from same place as close as possible with same position of plane etc.. for example over Dover to get good comparison. Otherwise nice set of pics. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.