|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
| View Poll Results: Would you sacrifice small graphical issues in order to be able to use 6-DoF | |||
| Yes I could cope with this as it would add to my flying experience |
   
|
270 | 85.44% |
| No, I'd rather have my head on a fixed stick thanks you very much |
  
|
46 | 14.56% |
| Voters: 316. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
02-21-2011, 06:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Thats the funniest footcam of WW2 I 've ever seen (the guy that gets blown away).
To me this small timeframe, where you can see the pilot, tells me following: There is no much space to move upward. Pilot can definitly move his head quite a bit, even if he is strapped. Its even easy ergonomical testing, which I can do at home - without moving my upper body, I can get my eyes near the line of my shoulders, although I cannot keep my head straight horizontal, but have to bank it. I also can look directly behind me, but again not straight and with one eye only. But I think this is all well clear - the fixed 4DoF is as unrealistic as the 6DoF in mods is. I say the kind and ammount of movement in a WW2 airplane, no matter which one, is very restricted (with the Bf109 being a very narrow one). And a 6DoF solution has to be like this.
__________________
 ---------------------------------------------- For bugreports, help and support contact: daidalos.team@googlemail.com For modelers - The IL-2 standard modeling specifications: IL-Modeling Bible Last edited by EJGr.Ost_Caspar; 02-21-2011 at 06:30 AM. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode