Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #171  
Old 06-02-2016, 06:49 PM
Pequod Pequod is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
Default

I´m so impressed with TD B-24D that I have only one humble request:
Make the B24J-100-CF flyable.
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old 06-03-2016, 10:53 AM
pandacat pandacat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 87
Default

TBD
TBF
TBM

Would be nice. Currently USN in game has no flyable torpedo bombers.
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old 06-03-2016, 03:03 PM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

More P-40 variants
Reply With Quote
  #174  
Old 06-04-2016, 03:32 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pandacat View Post
TBD
TBF
TBM
TBF and TBM are off-limits due to the NG Consent Decree. They will forever remain as AI-only planes.

A flyable TBD would give the US at least one flyable torpedo bomber, but it would be "interesting" to fly in combat.
Reply With Quote
  #175  
Old 06-04-2016, 03:51 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighterace View Post
More P-40 variants
The P-40N is the only big omission (P-40N-15-CU would be definitive), although the P-40K-10-CU and P-40L-5-CU fall into the "nice to have" category.

FWIW, all of these aircraft served on the Eastern Front, so would also help to fill in the gaps there. The P-40L mostly served in the MTO. The P-40K mostly served in the SW Pacific, and was extensively used by the RAAF, which would help fill in the the gaps in the Australian TOE.
Reply With Quote
  #176  
Old 06-04-2016, 08:56 AM
majorfailure majorfailure is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
The P-40N is the only big omission (P-40N-15-CU would be definitive), although the P-40K-10-CU and P-40L-5-CU fall into the "nice to have" category.
P-40L would be "very nice to have" for MTO. A "hotrod" P-40, I'd love that.
Reply With Quote
  #177  
Old 06-07-2016, 04:32 AM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by majorfailure View Post
P-40L would be "very nice to have" for MTO. A "hotrod" P-40, I'd love that.
Were IL2 to be focused on the MTO from 1941-44, the list of "must have" planes would be very different, and would probably include the P-40L and similar field mods.

While the number of planes deployed to the MTO was nowhere near those deployed on the Eastern Front, and the battles in North Africa and Italy were nowhere as big or as important as the battles of Stalingrad and Kursk, the period from 1941-43 was just as important to Western Allied tactical aviation as it was in Russia. During this time, the US and UK gradually gained air superiority over the Axis, and refined the tactical and strategic bombing techniques which gave them utter air superiority by late 1944.
Reply With Quote
  #178  
Old 06-07-2016, 11:06 AM
sniperton sniperton is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 253
Default

Agree. Eastern ETO is basically complete, there's little to be done there, except updating some very old models (which would be a huge work BTW).

PTO, on the contrary, and sadly, will never be complete and well-balanced due to the NG issue.

What remains as a prospective field for improvement is MTO (perhaps with BoF and BoB added and proper attention paid to naval warfare). The Med was won by the Allied by gaining naval and aerial superiority almost hand in hand.
Reply With Quote
  #179  
Old 06-08-2016, 03:53 PM
Pursuivant Pursuivant is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,439
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sniperton View Post
Agree. Eastern ETO is basically complete, there's little to be done there, except updating some very old models (which would be a huge work BTW).
There are a few rare birds which could be added to the Eastern Front, and of course, more planes made flyable. Filling in the gaps for the Soviets: Yer-2, Ar-2, Be-4, Yak-6, UT-2, and more Pe-2, and I-16. For the Germans: He-112, He-50, He-46, DFS 230, a variety of medium bomber types, and filling in the gaps for the Hungarian and Romanian AF.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sniperton View Post
PTO, on the contrary, and sadly, will never be complete and well-balanced due to the NG issue.
It depends. For late war US naval ops, we're screwed by NG. For US Army, Australian, Chinese, Dutch, Indian, New Zealand, and Royal Navy ops in the SW Pacific, CBI, Aleutians, and Japanese home islands, from 1941-45, and Sino-Japanese ops from 1937-41, there are entire theaters of war literally uncharted (as in, no maps for them) and dozens of planes which still aren't in the game.

Historically, the Japanese were dominant during the early war, and the allies dominated in the late war, but the individual planes used were more or less competitive. (e.g., Hurricane Mk. II vs. Ki-43, P-40N vs. Ki-44, P-51H vs. Ki-84)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sniperton View Post
What remains as a prospective field for improvement is MTO (perhaps with BoF and BoB added and proper attention paid to naval warfare). The Med was won by the Allied by gaining naval and aerial superiority almost hand in hand.
Currently, this seems like the easiest area for IL2 to expand into, since many of the necessary maps already exist, and most of the planes required are already in the game. The only real weakness in the MTO order of battle is the lack of early- to mid-war UK aircraft, although there would be some French, German, Italian, and US aircraft which would be very nice to have.

Another promising area for the game would be Western Front Ops over the North Sea, English Channel, and Bay of Biscay from 1941-44. Many of the necessary maps, ships, and planes already exist. The only gaps are for the UK, and a very few necessary planes for the Germans.
Reply With Quote
  #180  
Old 06-10-2016, 04:50 AM
Verdun1916 Verdun1916 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Hässleholm, Sweden
Posts: 204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sita View Post
unfurtunatly in my sight some other plane for now ...
Hi Sita!

May I ask, since there are no flyable British manufacured bomber in the stock game, are there any plans from TD to introduce any British bombers? Or make already present AI-ones like the Blenheim or the Wellington flyable?

Cheers and thanks for your and the rest of TD's great work!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.