Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-18-2012, 02:51 PM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

The devs need to continue to tweak the FM balance until there is equal amount of whining from both sides.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-18-2012, 03:06 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
The devs need to continue to tweak the FM balance until there is equal amount of whining from both sides.
quoted for truth, lol
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-18-2012, 03:06 PM
ATAG_Colander ATAG_Colander is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 214
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
The devs need to continue to tweak the FM balance until there is equal amount of whining from both sides.
I'm thinking of adding this to my signature
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2012, 03:20 PM
ATAG_Keller ATAG_Keller is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 91
Default

This RC2 patch has evened things up fairly well, but the few issues I see as a "Blue only" pilot are as follows.

-109 underperforms at high altitudes > 6000m

-The sound radar still seems to alert red pilots to a 109’s presence (I can have a spit 50m behind me and I hear nothing; my canopy is fully closed)

-Radiators on the 109 do seem fragile and seem to be the first thing to take damage

Fact of the matter is; if you’re in a 109 and you’re not above 5000m, you are not taking advantage of the main strength of your aircraft. Guys that hover over England at 2000m or lower are just asking for trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2012, 03:27 PM
macro macro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
The devs need to continue to tweak the FM balance until there is equal amount of whining from both sides.
Lol well said
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2012, 03:42 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

WWII air battles aren't stupid dogfights for nothing.

Fighters need to protect bombers, attack bomber, achieve air superiority.

If we are talking about boring and stupid dogfights over some terrain, like people love to do in some servers, maybe the blue fighters are best, but if i manage to shot down a lot of blue bombers over England with a Hurricane, and some Spits can distract the 109s doing BnZ... well, history tells the outcome...

It's a sim, not an arcade airquake. I don't lose my time chasing stupid 109s low level straffing over Hawkinge in ATAG, i chase bombers... And if some 109 pilot is happy only flying high and attacking lone Spitfires doing nothing, it's boring and does nothing to his side...

The missions itself gives more "balance" than FM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-18-2012, 03:46 PM
GraveyardJimmy GraveyardJimmy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post

The missions itself gives more "balance" than FM.
Not only that but the tactics of the players. Checking out the new Hurri FM I flew at about 16000 ft above the French coast on ATAG. Saw a group of dots moving together- oh it must be a bomber squadron. I go to have a look and find its about 4 109s of one of the JG squads, each attacked as a pair with the wingman and promptly pilot killed me after I tried circling down. I dont think they had any problem dealing with me at all...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-18-2012, 03:50 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

I couldn't help by noticing the "4 bf 109`s" and "pilot kill"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-18-2012, 03:56 PM
GraveyardJimmy GraveyardJimmy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
I couldn't help by noticing the "4 bf 109`s" and "pilot kill"
It was the first shots that hit my plane, I suffered no other damage other than coolant in the same burst, its not as if my aircraft was tanking 4 109s worth of cannon and mg shots! The whole encounter probably lasted 1 minute with them waiting for me to stop spin about then sweep in for the blast that one-shot my aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-18-2012, 05:37 PM
SlipBall's Avatar
SlipBall SlipBall is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: down Island, NY
Posts: 2,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GraveyardJimmy View Post
It was the first shots that hit my plane, I suffered no other damage other than coolant in the same burst, its not as if my aircraft was tanking 4 109s worth of cannon and mg shots! The whole encounter probably lasted 1 minute with them waiting for me to stop spin about then sweep in for the blast that one-shot my aircraft.

A skilled 109 pilot would be able to do that as a matter of choice. Just kill the pilot no rad damage with maybe 6or8 rounds to a Hur or a Spit1, but with later models, the pilot has much protection.
Attached Files
File Type: zip Bf 109Spit1.zip (259.8 KB, 8 views)
__________________



GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5

Last edited by SlipBall; 10-18-2012 at 07:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.