![]() |
|
|||||||
| FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
| View Poll Results: Are the incorrect British FM killing the enjoyment of the game? | |||
| Yes |
|
107 | 55.15% |
| No |
|
48 | 24.74% |
| Not bothered. |
|
39 | 20.10% |
| Voters: 194. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Robo,
I think what Doggles was talking about was that most reds blame the aircraft fro not being up to scratch and consider flying a 109 "easy". I have been on the recieving end of comments like "you only shot me down because the flight models porked!". - when the guy didnt even see me comming
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But on the other hand, when I fly the 109 and get a kill, I never know if I am really better than the other guy or if it's only mine and his ride.
__________________
Bobika. Last edited by Robo.; 08-20-2012 at 07:50 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Completely agree with the OP.
I fly a IIa all the time and in the latest beta patch its gone horrible! my max speed now is only 240MPH which is just way off real life stats.. Also, i keep cooking the engine which never used to happen at all! this is even with a fully open radiator! maybe i could live with the heating issue, but when my plane cant even catch up a bunch of bombers is where i draw the line: If anyone is interested here are the real life stats of the IIa: http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spitfire-II.html you will see that this game is way off performance wise. Also those arguing about 109 vs spitfire, i found a good documentary on the 2: <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ugBpAombpgs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/02WmH-pANZ0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> watch in the order i posted. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Watch video 2/2 first, as the YouTube poster has mislabled the order
|
![]() |
|
|