Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2012, 05:03 PM
skouras skouras is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Greece-Athens
Posts: 1,171
Default

personally i've always fly with the 109
simply cause i love it
but the spitfire in its current state is a mesh......FACT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2012, 05:38 PM
Winger Winger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skouras View Post
personally i've always fly with the 109
simply cause i love it
but the spitfire in its current state is a mesh......FACT

The tell me what must be changed and please sum up under the line for example like this:

Increase levelspeed at all heights RESULTING IN Higher Topspeed at all heights than 109

I really wonder what we will see afterwards. I am sure there stands something like this:

Increase RS RESULTING IN performing better in RS than 109

Increase TU RESULTING IN performing better in TU than 109

Increase VW RESULTING IN performing better in VW than 109

Increase XY RESULTING IN performing better in XY than 109

Winger
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-09-2012, 06:12 PM
BTB BTB is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winger View Post
The tell me what must be changed and please sum up under the line for example like this:

Increase levelspeed at all heights RESULTING IN Higher Topspeed at all heights than 109

I really wonder what we will see afterwards. I am sure there stands something like this:

Increase RS RESULTING IN performing better in RS than 109

Increase TU RESULTING IN performing better in TU than 109

Increase VW RESULTING IN performing better in VW than 109

Increase XY RESULTING IN performing better in XY than 109

Winger

Please Winger, inform u before posting such statements.

We are talking of top speed,rate of climb,Rpm's and the overheating issue of the Spitfire.
Not more and not less.
If your 109 would do only 400km/h level, i guess here would be a houndred topics,too ;D

Both sides want historical correctness, not more but even not less.

Before you haven't checked of what the Spitfire was capable and how it is ingame, pls stop trolling
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-2012, 06:24 PM
Winger Winger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BTB View Post
We are talking of top speed,rate of climb
LOL, and if you increase those what leaves us that with if you compare spits and 109s?
Sorry its just pathetic if a pilots needs a plane that does EVERYTHING better than the opposite one

Winger
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2012, 06:49 PM
BTB BTB is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16
Default

And why is it the Pilot's fault if the plane have this data?

Your postings are ignorant to those who fly on the red side.

Actually red Pilots try every bit for testing the Spits and getting at least a conclusion with which Spitfire u have a chance and didnt lack in performance so much.

I fly for both sides since beginning and for red it isnt funny at the moment.


Why u got shot down in a 109, didnt check 6, there was more then one Spitfire , u was turning and wasting energy. U got dived by a Spit.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-09-2012, 07:11 PM
Winger Winger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BTB View Post
And why is it the Pilot's fault if the plane have this data?

Your postings are ignorant to those who fly on the red side.

Actually red Pilots try every bit for testing the Spits and getting at least a conclusion with which Spitfire u have a chance and didnt lack in performance so much.

I fly for both sides since beginning and for red it isnt funny at the moment.


Why u got shot down in a 109, didnt check 6, there was more then one Spitfire , u was turning and wasting energy. U got dived by a Spit.
You speak as if you were there. I never turn with spits. I wrote that i dove from AND AFTER a spit. And btw. when i dove from it i had same energylevel. I wouldnt complain if i get jumped since i would have deserved it if something like that happens.

Now please tell me WHO IS IGNORANT HERE. LOOOL

Winger

Last edited by Winger; 08-09-2012 at 07:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-09-2012, 07:36 PM
JTDawg JTDawg is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winger View Post
LOL, and if you increase those what leaves us that with if you compare spits and 109s?
Sorry its just pathetic if a pilots needs a plane that does EVERYTHING better than the opposite one

Winger
Guess you just like easy kills !!! not looking for that 20 min DF That leaves your hand cramped at the end Wow We are not looking for uber plane or planes like yourself, We want aleast a competitive edge ie what the planes are suppose to do, nothing more nothing less. you need to troll on troll on down the roooad SEE THATS CATCHY!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-09-2012, 07:41 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winger View Post
The tell me what must be changed and please sum up under the line for example like this:

Increase levelspeed at all heights RESULTING IN Higher Topspeed at all heights than 109

I really wonder what we will see afterwards. I am sure there stands something like this:

Increase RS RESULTING IN performing better in RS than 109

Increase TU RESULTING IN performing better in TU than 109

Increase VW RESULTING IN performing better in VW than 109

Increase XY RESULTING IN performing better in XY than 109

Winger
Currently the 100 octane spits and hurris seem to have glass engines, that will fall apart if you try to run at combat power.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-09-2012, 08:25 PM
Trumper Trumper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 461
Default

If you want reality i doubt 20 minute dogfights were anywhere near the norm.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-09-2012, 09:03 PM
CaptainDoggles's Avatar
CaptainDoggles CaptainDoggles is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trumper View Post
If you want reality i doubt 20 minute dogfights were anywhere near the norm.
They're still hella fun, though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.