![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
| View Poll Results: Steam poll | |||
| Yes I have and like using Steam |
|
256 | 54.47% |
| Yes I have and dont like using Steam |
|
67 | 14.26% |
| No I do not have Steam but will for CoD |
|
52 | 11.06% |
| No I do not have Steam and will not for CoD |
|
95 | 20.21% |
| Voters: 470. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I seriously cannot fathom that some people here are actually against Steam.
Considering it is one of the finest digital distribution platforms in the world, and most of the initial problems have been ironed out, you'd think you lot were actually willing to accept that it is the perfect technology for CoD. Do you really think it is a coincidence that every single semi-major PC release today is distributed and marketed, primarily through Steam? Stop being such little crybabies, buy the game, and enjoy the service Steam will provide. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
steam works for me
i heard that steam was run by Galen Thurber, and a team of oompalumpa Galen clones tis the devil i tell you LOL Craig |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I won't, and i am mature enough to keep my word. Be sure that 1000s will use "other alternatives".
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So much so that every major publisher, pushing every major release, realises that Steam is the best way to market their game; for the good of all PC gamers. Honestly I truly believe (and I'm not alone) that without Steam pushing hard to keep PC gaming where it is today, we would all be forced to buy a damn console if we wanted to continue with our hobby. Won't it be great when we're all using "other alternatives" for all of the old games that were released on PC and there are no new games because all of the publishers have decided that because of all the "other alternatives" there's no point in publishing games for PC any more. Seriously, some people need to wake up and realise that PC gaming will die unless there are more ways to STOP piracy, ensure that publishers actually make a return on their investments, make sure that games developers can continue doing what they do best without their hard work being distributed through "other alternatives" And instead of discussing all of the things that Steam can do for PC gaming, people moan when they realise they can't have things nice and simple, just the way they like, just like the good old days, sod what the publishers need. Games publishing is a business, the publishers need to ensure they get a decent return on their investment, otherwise it's not economically viable for them to continue. Why is it so hard for people to understand that something like Steam HAD TO HAPPEN to keep PC gaming viable? All those whining that Steam shouldn't be necessary consider this: There are alternatives to using Windows as an operating system; do you choose to use Linux instead, or MAC OSX? Oh, but if you don't run Windows you can't run CloD. So shouldn't 1C and UBI be slated for not offering the game on alternative operating systems?
__________________
Flights of Fancy The Real Deal Battle Over Britain Two Little DUCs , Battle Over Britain Redux Last edited by Extreme_One; 03-15-2011 at 10:35 PM. |
![]() |
|
|