![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
While I still think it is wrong to shoot someone up in a chute IRL (except of course in a case like Bud Peterson talked about where it was simply battlefield justice), apparently Dowding agreed with Trigaaaar. From another website: "According to ACM H. Dowding in his despatch submitted to the Secratary of State for Air on August 20, 1941: Supplement to The London Gazette 11 September, 1946. PDF page 1, Supplement page 4553 items 158 to 160. 158. This is perhaps a convenient opportunity to say a word about the ethics of shooting at aircraft crews who have "baled out" in parachutes. 159. Germans descending over England are prospective Prisoners of War, and as such should be immune. On the other hand, British pilots descending over England are still potential Combatants. 160. Much indignation was caused by the fact that German pilots sometimes fired on our descending airmen (although, in my opinion, they were perfectly entitled to do so), but I am glad to say that in many cases they refrained and sometimes greeted a helpless adversary with a cheerful wave of the hand." This surprises me. Also, shooting at pilots who had bailed was not covered under the Geneva convention. So legally, it was ok. In the Pacific, it is important to note that the Japanese never signed on to the Geneva convention. It is also important to not that an Allied airman in the Pacific had a decent (not great) chance of being rescued at sea. The Japanese did not have as good a record of recovering their own pilots. Lastly, I think it is important to note that there are far more reports of acts of chivalry between airmen than there are verified accounts of "chute shooting". Exceptions to that seem to be German vs. Russian and Allies vs. Japanese. I think most of us would agree that there was a special brutality in those theaters of war for various reasons. Splitter |
|
|