Friday 2010-11-19 Dev. update and Discussion

[TheGrunch]

Originally Posted by Osprey

Please don't start Philip. This is a ludicrous question that will waste Oleg's time when he answers and you strike up a conversation. What do you want to know? If the relationship between the gunner arm length and harness release is realistically modelled, and their personality included in an algorithm to work out when they decide to try it so that we have an historically accurate chance of a rear gunner bailing out?

Really? They have to animate the gunner's exit from the aircraft anyway. It wouldn't take a horrible amount of time to just make the first part of the animation slower.

[major_setback]

Defiant walkarounds showing the inside of the turret (from a link in my previously posted link)

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=31021

[Osprey]

Originally Posted by TheGrunch

Really? They have to animate the gunner's exit from the aircraft anyway. It wouldn't take a horrible amount of time to just make the first part of the animation slower.

Have you people lost the plot? Let me get this straight. We have a BP Defiant being shot down and you want Oleg to divert project and hardware resources into modelling the various problematic scenarios that a rear gunner may or may not have in getting out??

I suppose you want the gunner actually modelled so that if he's hit in the lung he has breathing trouble, or perhaps he can get concussion. I know, how about we model that he's having girlfriend trouble and his mind isn't quite on the job because of the tears in his eyes

[He111]

Thanks, deffy shots look fantastic although those 109s are a tad close! Hope the AI isn't in ramming mode!?

.