![]() |
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nice there are two new FAA planes for IL2.
Maybe more should come,like Fairey Firefly and Barracuda. IDK if these updated are only for IL2,but planes like Ki-45,G3M and D3Y would be awesome too. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Agree on the Japanese aircraft. Both the IJN and Imperial Japanese Army Flying Corps are sorely in need of bomber and attack types.
Add to that the dubious 3D modeling and FMs of the current Japanese single seaters, it makes flying for the Emperor a very difficult, if heroic, enterprise.
__________________
![]() Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
France
D.520 (for France,Vichy,Romania and Italy) Potez 630 Breguet 693 Bloch M.B.210 Poland P.23 Karas P.37 Los P.50 Jastrzab LWS 6 Zubr UK Fairey Firefly Fairey Barracuda Vickers Wellington Avro Lancaster Short Stirling Boulton Paul Defiant Westland Lysander Hawker Typhoon US B-26 Marauder SB2C Helldiver Germany He-115 Ju-188 Do-17Z Ju-88 heavy fighter versions (C?) Italy Piaggio P.108 Cant Z.1007 Alcione Cant Z 501 Gabbiano Re 2005 Japan Ki-45 Nick G3M Nell Ki-67 Peggy A7M Ki-49 Helen D4Y1 Judy D4Y3 Judy P1Y Frances Last edited by bf-110; 04-19-2010 at 01:22 AM. Reason: forgot a italian fighters |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The rest maybe, but only eight of those were produced, and none flew operationally.
Wikipedia agrees. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_A7M Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Neither for IL2 1946?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
If that is what he meant, then I apologise.
I just don't want this forum to end up like AAA, where anyone who sees a vaguely WWII-related aircraft says 'gimme this'. TD are doing it for free, and should be thanked for what they do, not snowed under with unrealistic requests. Come to think of it, I'd apply that to 1C:Maddox too, and they will (hopefully) get paid for it. All the same, I wanna Walrus! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Something else I was thinking about posting. The damage modeling for the Ki-27 seems a little odd to me. A cannon surely destroys it but light machine guns seem to have little effect. It rarely lights on fire and it seems much tougher than other planes of a similar year. The Ki-43 is much weaker and easier to set on fire for example.
It's not just the setting on fire. It's the other components. Is it in some way flawed or meant to be this way?
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com |
![]() |
|
|