Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-18-2010, 11:19 PM
bf-110's Avatar
bf-110 bf-110 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SP,Brasil
Posts: 465
Default

France

D.520 (for France,Vichy,Romania and Italy)
Potez 630
Breguet 693
Bloch M.B.210

Poland

P.23 Karas
P.37 Los
P.50 Jastrzab
LWS 6 Zubr

UK

Fairey Firefly
Fairey Barracuda
Vickers Wellington
Avro Lancaster
Short Stirling
Boulton Paul Defiant
Westland Lysander
Hawker Typhoon

US

B-26 Marauder
SB2C Helldiver

Germany

He-115
Ju-188
Do-17Z
Ju-88 heavy fighter versions (C?)

Italy

Piaggio P.108
Cant Z.1007 Alcione
Cant Z 501 Gabbiano
Re 2005

Japan

Ki-45 Nick
G3M Nell
Ki-67 Peggy
A7M
Ki-49 Helen
D4Y1 Judy
D4Y3 Judy
P1Y Frances

Last edited by bf-110; 04-19-2010 at 01:22 AM. Reason: forgot a italian fighters
  #2  
Old 04-19-2010, 12:36 AM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bf-110 View Post
A7M
The rest maybe, but only eight of those were produced, and none flew operationally.

Wikipedia agrees.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_A7M

Quote:
While it was hoped that the A7M would replace the A6M, production was disrupted by an earthquake in December 1944 in the Nagoya region, and by Allied bombing, with only eight aircraft completed by the end of the war. The type never saw combat.
  #3  
Old 04-19-2010, 01:06 AM
bf-110's Avatar
bf-110 bf-110 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SP,Brasil
Posts: 465
Default

Neither for IL2 1946?
  #4  
Old 04-19-2010, 01:30 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bf-110 View Post
France

D.520 (for France,Vichy,Romania and Italy)
Potez 630
Breguet 693
Bloch M.B.210

Poland

P.23 Karas
P.37 Los
P.50 Jastrzab
LWS 6 Zubr

UK

Fairey Firefly
Fairey Barracuda
Vickers Wellington
Avro Lancaster
Short Stirling
Boulton Paul Defiant
Westland Lysander
Hawker Typhoon

US

B-26 Marauder
SB2C Helldiver

Germany

He-115
Ju-188
Do-17Z
Ju-88 heavy fighter versions (C?)

Italy

Piaggio P.108
Cant Z.1007 Alcione
Cant Z 501 Gabbiano
Re 2005

Japan

Ki-45 Nick
G3M Nell
Ki-67 Peggy
A7M
Ki-49 Helen
D4Y1 Judy
D4Y3 Judy
P1Y Frances
Have you actually bothered to read past threads that discuss the amount of work needed to add a single aircraft to IL-2, meeting the necessary standards? Anyone can come up with a wish-list, but try to be a little realistic.
  #5  
Old 04-19-2010, 02:01 AM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest View Post
Have you actually bothered to read past threads that discuss the amount of work needed to add a single aircraft to IL-2, meeting the necessary standards? Anyone can come up with a wish-list, but try to be a little realistic.
I think it's more like "any one of these would be nice" than "give us these, then", Andy.
  #6  
Old 04-19-2010, 02:33 AM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Default

If that is what he meant, then I apologise.

I just don't want this forum to end up like AAA, where anyone who sees a vaguely WWII-related aircraft says 'gimme this'. TD are doing it for free, and should be thanked for what they do, not snowed under with unrealistic requests. Come to think of it, I'd apply that to 1C:Maddox too, and they will (hopefully) get paid for it.

All the same, I wanna Walrus!
  #7  
Old 04-19-2010, 03:21 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Something else I was thinking about posting. The damage modeling for the Ki-27 seems a little odd to me. A cannon surely destroys it but light machine guns seem to have little effect. It rarely lights on fire and it seems much tougher than other planes of a similar year. The Ki-43 is much weaker and easier to set on fire for example.

It's not just the setting on fire. It's the other components. Is it in some way flawed or meant to be this way?
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
  #8  
Old 04-19-2010, 04:12 AM
bf-110's Avatar
bf-110 bf-110 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SP,Brasil
Posts: 465
Default

If they could add all,it would be superb,but even if they add only one of these,would be already a large step toward making IL2 a richer WWII combat sim.

Oh yes,and land vehicles,artillery and ships?I believe they are far less complicated to add ingame than planes(?)

Last edited by bf-110; 04-20-2010 at 02:22 AM.
  #9  
Old 04-20-2010, 10:13 PM
Billfish Billfish is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 91
Default

Ki-61 error thread updated.....

http://78sentai.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=401

K2
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.