Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2009, 07:13 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

I'm not knowledgable in these areas so I can't say anything.
  #2  
Old 10-05-2009, 09:47 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

The Nationalist Chinese "markings" you see in game are on skins, they are not a selectable country.

We must appease our Red Chinese Overlords after all.

__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #3  
Old 10-06-2009, 01:49 AM
hiro hiro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 352
Default sahweet, thanks for the patch

make all AI planes flyable

I'd like to see some of the more realistic sounds put in for the planes and efx like machine guns.

Kyushu J7W1 Shinden

Ask Oleg if you guys can fix the FW 190 cockpit (the bar you know).

TBF avenger (heck its in there you could rename it TP Revenger)

panzerfaust or (I forgot the name) anti tank rockets the Germans used. I don't want to fly late war jets or TA152C for rockets.

More late war naval torpedo / dive bomber planes like the B6N Jill and B5N2 Kate


Kyushu J7W1 Shinden

F8F Bearcat

Fiat G55

P-51 with rockets

Give bomber guys the B-17, B-24, Lancaster, and the luftwaffe that 4 engine bomber

Me-410 / 210

Kyushu J7W1 Shinden



Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
The Nationalist Chinese "markings" you see in game are on skins, they are not a selectable country.

We must appease our Red Chinese Overlords after all.

Be careful, looks like US is going in that direction. And Japan has began to repalce teaching English with Chinese . . .

I never thought America would "sellout" but the Chinese do wave alot of $$ and they do buy alot of bonds.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091001/...building_china

No I don't have just have a bone to pick. I just know someone who was shot by red officials because of his religious affiliation.
  #4  
Old 10-06-2009, 03:08 AM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

There appears to be quite a bit of confusion over the naming conventions associated with the 4.09 ---

Maybe you should think about calling it the 4.09F, 4.09Final,4.095 or something that differentiates it from the previous beta releases of 4.09, 4.09m.

It the coming months new IL2 users and some that have been away for awhile are going to be confused over just what files to download.

The download sites for the most part don't remove old stuff. The just leave the old stuff up like people "want it". LOL

A simple 4.09F (for final) and 4.09F-DS (for final dogfight server) would probably do the trick for everyone.

-----------------

Last edited by nearmiss; 10-06-2009 at 03:15 AM.
  #5  
Old 10-06-2009, 06:11 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Its called 4.09m, the previous beta version was 4.09bm.

Last edited by nearmiss; 10-06-2009 at 08:49 PM.
  #6  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:49 AM
Bloblast's Avatar
Bloblast Bloblast is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 289
Default

Is there the possibility to put the new planes in the current dynamic campaign?
__________________
Intel i7 970 6x3.2
ASUS Sabertooth X58
ASUS GTX580
Corsair 12GB 1600 Mhz
OZC SSD 120GB
  #7  
Old 10-06-2009, 02:18 PM
Juri_JS Juri_JS is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloblast View Post
Is there the possibility to put the new planes in the current dynamic campaign?
I have tried to add the Fokker as flyable plane to the Finnish Dgen campaign, but it didn't worked. It's disappointing that we can't use the new maps and aircraft in Dgen.
An update of the Dgen.exe file would be nice.

Last edited by Juri_JS; 10-06-2009 at 02:22 PM.
  #8  
Old 10-06-2009, 06:07 PM
Metus Metus is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
Thumbs up

Thank you for the new patch !

No other game fascinates me over such a long time period as IL2 does.

Is it possible to make the new airplanes viewable in the "View Objects" ingame screen?
Maybe it's just my installation but I cannot find them
I don't need the text; only want to see them if it's too much work.

Thank you.

PS: Looking forward to further patches
  #9  
Old 10-06-2009, 09:43 PM
96th_Nightshifter 96th_Nightshifter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 78
Default

Not sure if this has been asked before and I'm not about to read through 40+ pages

Is there any possibility of any of the higher quality of MOD aircraft that have been produced ever being "officially" added via one of the future DT patches?

The Spitfire MK.XII, MK.XIV and the A3 FW spring to mind and I'm sure many of you know about the high quality Whirlwind and Lancaster that are being worked on over at RAF662.

Just curious as I would love to see some of this work officially recognised.
  #10  
Old 10-06-2009, 09:50 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 96th_Nightshifter View Post
Not sure if this has been asked before and I'm not about to read through 40+ pages

Is there any possibility of any of the higher quality of MOD aircraft that have been produced ever being "officially" added via one of the future DT patches?

The Spitfire MK.XII, MK.XIV and the A3 FW spring to mind and I'm sure many of you know about the high quality Whirlwind and Lancaster that are being worked on over at RAF662.

Just curious as I would love to see some of this work officially recognised.
I definitely agree. I almost suggested this myself, I'm not sure why I didn't. The Spit XII and XIV are the only ones I have personal experience of that I'd say were up to the right standard. The flightmodels I can't comment on (they definitely aren't uberplanes), but the models certainly are almost perfect.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.