Yak-9T - incredible firepower (or maybe incredible tank's lack of armor?)

[swiss]

Hmm, T-34 did use diesel fuel, that does not burn instantaneously, must have been a lucky hit.

An idea that crossed my mind too, then again phosphorus can light pretty much everything.
Feel free to download your very own copy of "stuka pilot".

[bladeracer]

Originally Posted by swiss

An idea that crossed my mind too, then again phosphorus can light pretty much everything.
Feel free to download your very own copy of "stuka pilot".

Is this the same "Stuka Pilot" written by the guy that didn't even know that his aircraft used a dive siren?
If Rudel didn't understand something so basic about the operation of the aircraft that made him famous why would you consider anything else he wrote to be entirely factual?

[swiss]

Originally Posted by bladeracer

Is this the same "Stuka Pilot" written by the guy that didn't even know that his aircraft used a dive siren?
If Rudel didn't understand something so basic about the operation of the aircraft that made him famous why would you consider anything else he wrote to be entirely factual?

What are you referring too?

[bladeracer]

Originally Posted by swiss

What are you referring too?

You haven't read Rudel's book?
He states that the Stuka did not have a siren and that the noise was simply a result of air passing through the dive brakes.

[swiss]

Originally Posted by bladeracer

You haven't read Rudel's book?
He states that the Stuka did not have a siren and that the noise was simply a result of air passing through the dive brakes.

Don't know which Stuka he was speaking of(only B models had sirens), couldn't find that passage either(Ballatine pdf Version).
Do you know the page number or can you narrow it down a bit?

[bladeracer]

Originally Posted by swiss

Don't know which Stuka he was speaking of(only B models had sirens), couldn't find that passage either(Ballatine pdf Version).
Do you know the page number or can you narrow it down a bit?

It doesn't matter which model he was speaking of, his claim is that the dive scream was not deliberately generated by a siren, which we all know was indeed a siren.
I don't have the book handy but if you have it in PDF try searching it for references to the siren.
I thought the sirens were installed more by date than by model? Weren't D's also fitted with the siren early on alongside the B's? I know when the D's were converted to G's the sirens were removed as they weren't dive bombers.

[IceFire]

Originally Posted by bladeracer

It doesn't matter which model he was speaking of, his claim is that the dive scream was not deliberately generated by a siren, which we all know was indeed a siren.
I don't have the book handy but if you have it in PDF try searching it for references to the siren.
I thought the sirens were installed more by date than by model? Weren't D's also fitted with the siren early on alongside the B's? I know when the D's were converted to G's the sirens were removed as they weren't dive bombers.

Many veteran authors make many mistakes in their technical accounts. I've red at least a few books that mention 30mm cannons when they really mean 20mm cannons for example. That's just about their own equipment. Then you have them talking about what the enemy uses and that gets even less accurate... but that's easy enough to chalk up to the fog of war.

I think veteran accounts are important pieces of first hand historical research but they don't always make for the best place to gather technical details. It doesn't invalidate the research but it does mean that you have to look in many places for the best answer.