Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-24-2009, 04:20 PM
Mango Mango is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 91
Default

I think cut scene animations and animated pilot in cockpit = waste of valuable development time with no long term value to the game.

Most of the gimmicky things people are asking for will lose their appeal very quickly. Even those asking for cut scenes will get bored of them after 2 or 3 viewings. Remember that we experience flight sims 99% from the pilot's point of view.

And tell me, when you're driving a car, who really notices their own body in their field of view? Nobody pays attention to their hands on the steering wheel.

It also effects immersion if we see badly rendered 3D humanoids (which can never be rendered as well as solid structures) intermingled with the beautiful graphical environment we'll be immersed in.

The virtual world that we fly in will be greatly enhanced by what we see from the cockpit, what we hear over the radio, and what we read in breifings; not by 3rd person views of pilot animations or cut scenes.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-24-2009, 04:41 PM
Lucas_From_Hell Lucas_From_Hell is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mango View Post
I think cut scene animations and animated pilot in cockpit = waste of valuable development time with no long term value to the game.
Anyone here realizes that it's not that complex to animate the freakin' pilot inside the cockpit? People just say it like they needed to rebuild the engine to make the pilot inside. Nobody is asking to put this in the top of their priorities list, but it's a feature that have to be considered.

Plus, let's be democratic here. No one is pointing a gun to your head and saying you will HAVE to fly with pilot inside the cockpit. You can simply switch it on or off, depending on your preferences. There's no point in denying something people would like just because YOU dislike it. That's being a bit selfish, don't you think?

My opinion still is: immersion is not determined by major features, but by the smallest details. In the end, you're always sitting in a chair looking to a freakin' monitor. But if you're sitting in that chair, hearing the pilot's breathing, with that lonely feel after everyone suddently disappeared, hearing the symphony made by that noisy Merlin engine and the static from the radio, and yet feeling like there's a strange silence, seeing your arms and legs doing some rather nervous movements to help you checking all angles for enemies, keeping a sharp eye on the oxygen gauge, and having to dive a bit to get some air... it just makes you feel closer to being inside the cockpit, instead of the chair in front of the monitor.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-24-2009, 05:11 PM
proton45's Avatar
proton45 proton45 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 651
Default

Dear Oleg....

This is all very interesting, but I'm still curious how damage will be calculated? Is damage going to be calculated by the physics of materials clashing (and the damage of accelerates & rapid oxidation)? Or...what are your thoughts on the issue?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-24-2009, 05:23 PM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas_From_Hell View Post
Anyone here realizes that it's not that complex to animate the freakin' pilot inside the cockpit? People just say it like they needed to rebuild the engine to make the pilot inside. Nobody is asking to put this in the top of their priorities list, but it's a feature that have to be considered.

Plus, let's be democratic here. No one is pointing a gun to your head and saying you will HAVE to fly with pilot inside the cockpit. You can simply switch it on or off, depending on your preferences. There's no point in denying something people would like just because YOU dislike it. That's being a bit selfish, don't you think?

My opinion still is: immersion is not determined by major features, but by the smallest details. In the end, you're always sitting in a chair looking to a freakin' monitor. But if you're sitting in that chair, hearing the pilot's breathing, with that lonely feel after everyone suddently disappeared, hearing the symphony made by that noisy Merlin engine and the static from the radio, and yet feeling like there's a strange silence, seeing your arms and legs doing some rather nervous movements to help you checking all angles for enemies, keeping a sharp eye on the oxygen gauge, and having to dive a bit to get some air... it just makes you feel closer to being inside the cockpit, instead of the chair in front of the monitor.


Problem is, they need to make 1 pilot for every ac in game/new edition = S**tload of work.


Unless u wanna a stick or throttle petruding out of pilots leg for ex. because it fits in one cockpit and not the other. (as Oleg allredy stated, though i think he meant the movements of the 3D pilot, as in fine in one ac but leg outside the fuselage in another ac)


Not to mention the complexity involved if u wanna make the animation work with a clickeble cockpit (future maby?) . Will pilot move his arm when u puch down the flaps key, how will that work while df`ing animation wise, will pilot swich hand on control column if needed, or the pilots arms blocking instruments etc. etc.


Well, u get the idea of how "easy" it is to implement. (to a standard Oleg is willing to allow)



Would it be cool? Hell yah. Is it worth the work involved? Not according to Oleg.


Maby a future 3:rd party addon, who knows (if even possible)

Last edited by Baron; 11-24-2009 at 05:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-24-2009, 05:40 PM
Lucas_From_Hell Lucas_From_Hell is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron View Post
Not to mention the complexity involved if u wanna make the animation work with a clickeble cockpit. Or the pilots arms blocking instruments. Will pilot move his arm when u puch down the flaps key, how will that work while df`ing etc. etc.
No one asked for such detail, or pilot clicking all around or whatever. As I said, stick - throttle - rudder, similar to the DCS one.

If pilots (or humans, in general) are going to be detailed as stated by Oleg himself (I'm considering it has basic animations related to arms and legs), there could be room for putting a human pilot inside the cockpit, and articulate him to fit each cockpit, just as a normal pilot do. Move the leg a bit right/left, just move the left hand a bit, right hand around the stick and... voilà, you just have your pilot fitted to another aircraft.

I might be wrong about the possibilities of humans in-game, but, from what I understood, this isn't that tricky to model as people propose.

EDIT: Sorry, didn't saw the last post. At least I guess this will be possible to be made by users after the release.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-24-2009, 05:27 PM
KOM.Nausicaa KOM.Nausicaa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas_From_Hell View Post
Anyone here realizes that it's not that complex to animate the freakin' pilot inside the cockpit?
It has already been answered:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luthier
"We don't have anywhere near the time needed to animate the pilot model properly. We can put his hands on throttle and stick and feet on pedals, and then in half the cockpits he'll have other levers clipping through his body, stick clipping through his knees, etc. His arms will obscure important gauges on the dashboard.

With our new 6DOF free camera system that allows you to poke your head out the window or "bend" forward and look at the seat back, there's just no way we can animate the body to follow the camera, meaning you'd be able to twist your neck and look back on your own headless contorted body.

So, the answer is no. A poltergeist cockpit is not perfect, but the alternative is even worse. "
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-25-2009, 01:35 PM
Oleg Maddox Oleg Maddox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucas_From_Hell View Post
Anyone here realizes that it's not that complex to animate the freakin' pilot inside the cockpit?
Even if we have already sceleton kinematics the work over animations is great. Just imagine how many varios of postions types of cloumns, seats of gunners, etc... in different aircraft.
And for each there must be different animations...
it is really more complex then to make standard sets of one the same movements for all of the soldiers in shooter....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-25-2009, 02:22 PM
Lucas_From_Hell Lucas_From_Hell is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Maddox View Post
Even if we have already sceleton kinematics the work over animations is great. Just imagine how many varios of postions types of cloumns, seats of gunners, etc... in different aircraft.
And for each there must be different animations...
it is really more complex then to make standard sets of one the same movements for all of the soldiers in shooter....
Understood. I hope this is done later by other users that like the idea.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-24-2009, 09:04 PM
whatnot whatnot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mango View Post
I think cut scene animations and animated pilot in cockpit = waste of valuable development time with no long term value to the game.
When we talk about details like how the fuselage of a plane should sway with the waves when a plane crashlands into the sea I think adding an element as focal as a pilot into a an plane is well worth concidering.

Especially since this is probably something that'll be very hard to mod aferwards.

Edit after seeing a few repliers from Oleg & co: This is ofcourse the decision of the development team, but I think it's important that they're aware that visible pilots and other immersion enhancers are a very important factor for many simmers.

Last edited by whatnot; 11-24-2009 at 09:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-24-2009, 09:23 PM
genbrien genbrien is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnot View Post

Especially since this is probably something that'll be very hard to mod aferwards.
how do you know.... look at the mods that are made this days.... nobody tought that IL2 was '' that modable''
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.