Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-22-2011, 08:28 AM
jayrc's Avatar
jayrc jayrc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Default gtx 560 ti

what are the ideal video settings I should be using with my gpu(gtx560 ti SC 1 gb), I've seen some people with the same card as me running everything maximum settings, would love to see a screen shot of your video settings, please

here's mine
Attached Images
File Type: jpg il2video settigs.jpg (14.4 KB, 46 views)

Last edited by jayrc; 06-22-2011 at 08:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2011, 08:54 AM
Baron Baron is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 705
Default

I think u would benefit from raising your res to at least 1680x1050 instead. I use that and everything on medium with grass, roads etc. checked simply to get high fps without cutting back on graphics to much.

Got the same gpu and cpu as u.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-22-2011, 09:23 AM
Tiger27 Tiger27 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 319
Default

Im running everything high except land texture and land shading and forest medium, roads, shadows and grass on vsync on in control panel not ticked in game and AA 4x but I do run at 1680x1050 which is native to my old 22in runs very smooth over sea and most land, very minor stutters over London down low, if looking over the wing, av. about 20fps down low over London and 40+ in most other situations.

Also my card is the stock Asus card so it only has a slight OC, I havent OCed further yet but will probably bump it up a bit in the future if needed.

Last edited by Tiger27; 06-22-2011 at 09:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-22-2011, 10:44 AM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger27 View Post
Im running everything high except land texture
Why you don't maximize texture? I tested a lot and have same performance with texture Original or High... What I put OFF now is forest... If I can't crash hitting trees I don't want that they block my vision in MP. No big hit in performance, but it's just eyecandy with some minor hit in FPS but big in MP gameplay.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-22-2011, 02:03 PM
jayrc's Avatar
jayrc jayrc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Default

how did you get clod into your nvidia control panel, thanks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:07 AM
Tiger27 Tiger27 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
Why you don't maximize texture? I tested a lot and have same performance with texture Original or High... What I put OFF now is forest... If I can't crash hitting trees I don't want that they block my vision in MP. No big hit in performance, but it's just eyecandy with some minor hit in FPS but big in MP gameplay.
Yes I run original, I think I meant land detail and land shading.

I actually find it smoother with building amount set to unlimited
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:08 AM
Tiger27 Tiger27 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayrc View Post
how did you get clod into your nvidia control panel, thanks
I dont, I just use the global settings, with vsync forced on, then its turned off in CoD, it works fine this way.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-23-2011, 11:41 AM
335th_GRAthos 335th_GRAthos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger27 View Post
Yes I run original,
I actually find it smoother with building amount set to unlimited


Thanks for the tips gents, I will try these two things as well.

From my side, removing the tick on SHADOWS, you have a big improvement in fps.

~S~
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-23-2011, 02:28 PM
jayrc's Avatar
jayrc jayrc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 339
Default

1+ thanks
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-30-2011, 06:01 PM
IbnSolmyr IbnSolmyr is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 91
Default

I'm receiving my 560 Ti in a few days, it will complete my new PC rig. I'll comme back to this thread..

But by the way, it depends a lot of the 560 you have :

- Stock Nvidia GTX 560 Ti : GPU @ 822 Mhz, Shaders @ 1644 Mhz, RAM @ 4002 Mhz
- Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti OC : GPU @ 900 Mhz, Shaders @ 1800 Mhz, RAM @ 4002 Mhz. (> easily 8 % better than the stock one)
- Mine : Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti SOC (new series) : GPU @ 950 Mhz, Shaders @ 1900 Mhz, RAM @ 4580 Mhz. (> easily 15 % better than the stock one)
- The most powerful 560 ever built : Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti SOC (not produced anymore as it, reproduced in lower series, the one i'm getting) GPU @ 1000 Mhz, Shaders @ 2000 Mhz, RAM @ 4580 Mhz. (> easily 20 % better than the stock one)

Gigabyte is the constructor which pushed the card at its limits. They got a too important back rate, so changed in a bit lower one. Others did some 560 OCs.
For your information, it seems that the card is easily OCable in terms of RAM frequencies... Some pushed it at average 4800 Mhz without fidgeting the tensions.

Last edited by IbnSolmyr; 06-30-2011 at 06:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.