Quote:
Originally Posted by AbortedMan
I think we know the answer to that question...its the "no balls" solution, by the way...but balls or not, nothing is going to polish this turd any more than it has been.
...at least perusing the forums and reading about the next publicity stunt patch fail that 1C regularly pulls is fun form time to time...almost worth my $50.
|
We don't know the answer to it yet, that's why I asked. I haven't had the chance to try the new patch, but if Catseye and the others I've seen post about the issue are having serious issues getting a Hurricane started within 9 minutes, I don't see why we should be switching to this patch.
I personally don't want to have to go back to the 'air start' solution.
Over the next couple of days, we'll certainly find out if there's a reliable start up procedure for these aircraft.
I'm still amazed at the difference in start-up time though between the 109s and the RAF fighters, even when we COULD get the aircraft started and idling. Is it really that quick from start up to clean running in a 109?
09-29-2012, 12:41 AM
Threaded Mode