Thursday Update, April 19, 2012

[JG52Uther]

Ignore list is great, I can only see half this thread! (The bits worth reading)

I really do hope there are other things in the beta we don't know about, or I can actually imagine all the '6 months for this?' posts.

[Fjordmonkey]

Originally Posted by JG52Uther

I really do hope there are other things in the beta we don't know about, or I can actually imagine all the '6 months for this?' posts.

Those will undoubtedly come no matter how awesome the patch may or may not be

But hell, I'll settle for a game that's playable over time. That's enough for me. Until then I'll enjoy poking my head in here and watching the mayhem and exchange of opinions going back and forth like pingpong

[Chivas]

I don't know how many million lines of code there are, but there is a reason that there is inhouse testing, expanded inhouse testing, and sending out beta testing to a wider group. Its almost impossible to test every situation and bugs can be missed. You can fix a hundred bugs, but those fixes can create bugs in other graphic features. To suggest there is some sort of malicious skulduggery going on is beyond immature, when the developer can only guess when responding to the endless "when will it be finished questions".

[PLebre]

Just a question.

Is the laggy movement of the "manche" in cockpit view and external parties like flaps, etc, gonna be correct to smmoth movement, in this future patch?

[Stipe]

Where are the mods when you need them? Same people in every thread saying the same things over and over and over again. Grow up finally will you!?

[satchenko]

OK... really bad news...
"Two weeks" from now... 8-10 days fixing the problem, 3-4 days to test again...

[addman]

Originally Posted by JG52Uther

Ignore list is great, I can only see half this thread! (The bits worth reading)

I really do hope there are other things in the beta we don't know about, or I can actually imagine all the '6 months for this?' posts.

Well in last Friday update they said there's plenty more, I'm more interested about that then any performance increase.

[hc_wolf]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

It's been a year since the release mess. Get over it.

I think it is funny that Ataros did not translate the sentence in Russian that said "Since we were unable to procure Tree_UK's experience, dedication and non-whinging personality to assist us in fixing COD, that we regret we will have to use dedicated programmers and our own brilliant staff to do what Tree_UK could have done between scratching his butt and sniffing his finger. SOrry all for the short delay while we fix these small bugs that we would like fixed you all can enjoy the fruits of the 1C teams labour.".

Well that is what spat out in google translate...

Thanks BS, gives me more time to build online missions. Overall I think the positive response from most has bee great. Wish your team the best! "

Originally Posted by Chivas

I don't know how many million lines of code there are, but there is a reason that there is inhouse testing, expanded inhouse testing, and sending out beta testing to a wider group. Its almost impossible to test every situation and bugs can be missed. You can fix a hundred bugs, but those fixes can create bugs in other graphic features. To suggest there is some sort of malicious skulduggery going on is beyond immature, when the developer can only guess when responding to the endless "when will it be finished questions".

So what kind of maturity is shown releasing a product you know doesn't work, just out of interest?

[fruitbat]

Have you guys heard of PM?