![]() |
|
Pilot's Lounge Members meetup |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
I didn't put the option since there was not a reason... dead is dead over any territory. What's about then? The 110 was the only one fighter who could CAP over England because of his range. The 109s were better fighters but not could provide air superiority alone. With an automomy of 15 minutes over London they could not do very much... what it they went to battle using droptanks to increase their autonomy? They could "protect" the bombers staying directly over english airbases, attacking the Spits/Hurries during their path for the bomber stream. This is air superiority. Germany made a mistake when started the battle with this kind of equipment (and we can say the same about Stukas, great CAS machine who NEED air superiority to survive) Quote:
Instead the Channel is responsable for itself alone... the Germans have lost so much because of it. So, I repeat my opinion: UK won the battle, of course, but more because Nazis' stupidity than for allied pilots' skill and machines. I hope we'll fight each other again in campaign with shorter missions... 3 hours are too much for me ![]()
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 04-10-2012 at 06:32 PM. |
|
|