![]() |
|
Pilot's Lounge Members meetup |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello mate!
![]() I see you're doing a great job in the Marianas' campaign! !S!
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah its been really good fun, thanks for the invite, !S!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
I didn't put the option since there was not a reason... dead is dead over any territory. What's about then? The 110 was the only one fighter who could CAP over England because of his range. The 109s were better fighters but not could provide air superiority alone. With an automomy of 15 minutes over London they could not do very much... what it they went to battle using droptanks to increase their autonomy? They could "protect" the bombers staying directly over english airbases, attacking the Spits/Hurries during their path for the bomber stream. This is air superiority. Germany made a mistake when started the battle with this kind of equipment (and we can say the same about Stukas, great CAS machine who NEED air superiority to survive) Quote:
Instead the Channel is responsable for itself alone... the Germans have lost so much because of it. So, I repeat my opinion: UK won the battle, of course, but more because Nazis' stupidity than for allied pilots' skill and machines. I hope we'll fight each other again in campaign with shorter missions... 3 hours are too much for me ![]()
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 04-10-2012 at 06:32 PM. |
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by taildraggernut; 04-10-2012 at 07:03 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just to clarify a couple of points about air-sea rescue during the battle: for the British this was one of their weakest links and biggest oversights because there was no real a/s rescue organisation set up - British pilots and aircrew who ended up in the 'oggin were lucky if they either landed near a convoy and were picked up by a passing ship, or were close enough to land to swim ashore, or close enough to one of the German rescue buoys - otherwise they were often left to their own devices -according to this:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/w...f-Britain.html maybe 200 pilots were lost because of this failure. According to Stephan Bungay The Most Dangerous Enemy: A History of the Battle of Britain even the issue shirts worn by British pilots and aircrew (made by Litchfield) were a liability because the collars would shrink when wet, possibly helping to strangle the poor wearer. In addition, the issue "Mae Wests" were not self-inflating and it was well nigh impossible for someone who was injured or in shock to have the strength to inflate it. Of course, on top of it all the normally cold water meant hypothermia could set in very quickly. By contrast the Luftwaffe was highly organised, with Seenotdienst air-sea rescue units, properly equipped rescue buoys and reasonable life jackets and life rafts, and all aircrew carried sachets fluorescein which created a large, easy-to-see, bright green patch when in contact with water. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Dammit even if I claim the German machines weren't really so great (me110, Stukas, He111 and above all the serious 109's lack of firepower and range...) you act like I'm a German lover and of course a big GB hater... An you've broken this too... ![]()
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 04-10-2012 at 11:55 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
National Pride ... even to the point of being irrational ... was a foundation stone for National Socialism.
Just saying .... |
![]() |
|
|