Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2012, 01:31 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Managed to get the usage with GPU-Z. Clocks ticked in normally 925/1375MHz, memory was used up to 921Mb average being 800Mb or so. GPU usage varied between 20-91%, average around 40-50%.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2012, 05:31 PM
TheEditor TheEditor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 221
Default

Only 40-50%? Is that a cpu bottleneck or is the games code at fault?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-26-2012, 06:23 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Editor, my bet is on the game code. Eagerly waiting for the patch to see what it brings to the table
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-26-2012, 06:51 PM
Ataros Ataros is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: USSR
Posts: 2,439
Default

On the other hand this shows that the game scales well with CPU speed:
Quote:
I5-2500К-3.3GHz
min=13/14/15
avg=45/46
max=113/114/119

I5-2500К@4.0GHz
min=14/15/17
avg=50/51
max=134/138/140

I5-2500К@4.5GHz
min=14/15
avg=55/56
max=152/156/160

SSAO=off, AA=off, VSYNC=off.

ASRock P67 Extreme6 / Gainward GTX 580 / DDR3 1600 G.Skill 3X4 Gb / Crucial M4 CT128 SSD + CT064M4SSD2 /Asus Xonar Essence STX/ Monitor DELL U2410 1920x1200 / Windows 7 Home Premium - 64 bit / Warthog / TrackIR 5
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-26-2012, 07:02 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Seems the 4GHz is the sweet spot as above it the gain is less. I rather run stock as other games cause run extremely well anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-26-2012, 11:50 PM
priller26 priller26 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker35M View Post
S!

Seems the 4GHz is the sweet spot as above it the gain is less. I rather run stock as other games cause run extremely well anyway.

Does anyone, AMD or Intel even make a cpu that runs stock at 4.0 or above?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-27-2012, 12:55 AM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by priller26 View Post
Does anyone, AMD or Intel even make a cpu that runs stock at 4.0 or above?
The Intel Core i7 3960X comes close in turbo mode (3.9 GHz), but you really would just get the 3930X (3.8GHz) and overclock it for the $500+ difference
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-12-2012, 08:22 AM
FFCW_Urizen's Avatar
FFCW_Urizen FFCW_Urizen is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ataros View Post
On the other hand this shows that the game scales well with CPU speed:

Quote:
I5-2500К-3.3GHz
min=13/14/15
avg=45/46
max=113/114/119

I5-2500К@4.0GHz
min=14/15/17
avg=50/51
max=134/138/140

I5-2500К@4.5GHz
min=14/15
avg=55/56
max=152/156/160

SSAO=off, AA=off, VSYNC=off.

ASRock P67 Extreme6 / Gainward GTX 580 / DDR3 1600 G.Skill 3X4 Gb / Crucial M4 CT128 SSD + CT064M4SSD2 /Asus Xonar Essence STX/ Monitor DELL U2410 1920x1200 / Windows 7 Home Premium - 64 bit / Warthog / TrackIR 5
Not necessarilty. As NV cards, or more accurately the driver allows to outsource some calculations onto the CPU, this increase in fps may not be mainly due to ocing the cpu but a result of nv drivers. so, in case of nv-gpus, it would be nice to know, if that particular setting (iirc "Multithreading" or something alike) is activated or not, and best, such tests should be run with it on and off to get a conclusive result.

This is of much concern for me, as i´m planning on replacing my Q6700 (as it is already 4 years old, hence i don´t call it an upgrade ) and would like to know, what cpu will i really need. not just for clod, but other games as well.
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
The devs need to continue to tweak the FM balance until there is equal amount of whining from both sides.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-12-2012, 08:26 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

How many games really use several cores efficiently, as what I've read it is not "just like that" to program real multicore support or such. Will be interesting to see how Kepler will be and the upcoming AMD updates. Seems the GPU contest is getting very interesting
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-12-2012, 10:14 PM
priller26 priller26 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 266
Default

Well, my cpu...AMD Phenon 1100T x6 at 3.8 with win 7 64, 16 gigs of ram, and the 3 gig nvidia 580GTX SHOULD be able to easily handle particle effects, it does with no issue whatsoever in DSC A10, and shouldn't with this game as well. When frame rates come down from 60 flying to 8 upon landing kicking up dust, that tells me its not my cpu or gpu.

Thanks all for your help!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.