Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-18-2012, 01:10 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

that's what I don't get: all that refined engineering for an aircraft meant for war, which costs a bomb not only to buy, but to maintain as well, and frankly not that insanely revolutionary

EDIT:
well, it's not that I don't actually get it, but I find it a ridiculous speculation for something that can be so easily destroyed and won't have much longevity anyway..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-18-2012, 01:14 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Regarding UK choice for teh F35, I won't be surprised if in a decade the politics revert the move back from CToL to VTOL. We alrdy hve seen that with the F4 The worst of teh story was the selling of the entire Joint harrier force for 35M$.
Surprising statement, I don't see any reason, VTOL birds are going to be much more expensive and the new QE class carrier will be geared arount CTOL ops, we are after all talking about operating french units from UK carriers and the french don't have any VTOL, so I don't see an operational need for VTOL.

p.s. F4?

p.p.s. even more annoying was that we bought all our harriers from the US in the first place
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-18-2012, 01:33 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Well if you are looking back at FAA past 40 years, the usage of a small carrier force was well theorized and efficiently put at work. Today Italy, Spain, India, Russia has gained from that "heritage".

Bigger carrier need to work in dual, with a wider backup crew force and logistic.

I fear that the move to bigger unit will lower the force effectiveness. I am not a pro VTOL but we hev seen in France that a single large unit does not provide as much deterrence as two smaller (and older). There is a strategical capacity loss despite all the top tech hardware that give a short tactical advantage.

If the carrier were build in a series such as it was envisioned at the beginning, the price gain would hve make a two carrier force possible and sustanaible. Now i'ts not. Hve a look to our flat top and how rusty it looks alrdy.

F4 stands for F4 Phantom K (with spey eng )
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg F4K.jpeg (29.6 KB, 11 views)

Last edited by TomcatViP; 01-18-2012 at 01:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-18-2012, 01:40 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

nice reading about the after war RN carrier 'drama'
http://navy-matters.beedall.com/cva01.htm
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-18-2012, 02:03 PM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
F4 stands for F4 Phantom K (with spey eng )
Ah OK....I didn't realise you were on a more historical theme, yes I know the UK variants of the Phantom.
__________________


Intel Q9550 @3.3ghz(OC), Asus rampage extreme MOBO, Nvidia GTX470 1.2Gb Vram, 8Gb DDR3 Ram, Win 7 64bit ultimate edition
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-20-2012, 04:02 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
nice reading about the after war RN carrier 'drama'
http://navy-matters.beedall.com/cva01.htm
Thx!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-20-2012, 06:08 PM
Sven Sven is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Netherlands, Zeeland
Posts: 787
Default

Pretty impressive piece of engineering right there!

Good video quality as well, beautiful to see
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-20-2012, 09:43 PM
ATAG_Doc ATAG_Doc is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: A brothel in the Mekong Delta
Posts: 1,546
Default

Nice video thanks for sharing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.