Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 10-31-2011, 04:54 PM
BP_Tailspin BP_Tailspin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 170
Default

This place never ceases to entertain me …

Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
i surprisingly just found out that the rads settings of the 109 have no impact on speed at all...
Should they have an impact on speed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
normally i fly with them as much closed as possible, to avoid engine overheating, while maintaining the minimum air resistance...however i found out that one can leave the rads fully open and still reach and hold the top speed in level flight....
Keeping your 109 cool sounds good to me and without a performance hit is even better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
that should be looked into by the devs,
I think there busy trying to make the “game” playable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
cause i would assume that a fully opened radiator should cause enough surface to slow the aircraft down...
Key word here is “assume”

Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
i have to say that this fact is extremely disappointing,
Fact? Please quote your aeronautical engineering data.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
as CEM and FMs are supposed to be the strengths of this game(sim?)
Key word here is “game” but maybe it’s more of a “sim” than we think. The P51 Mustang’s radiator has a low/no drag design.

“The duct for the radiator was designed to slow the incoming air down. The air could then absorb more heat from the radiator, but the radiator needed to be made larger because of the slower air velocity, which meant installation in the rear fuselage. After the air passed through the radiator, it expanded due to the heat and was accelerated out the back, producing some thrust to counter the drag the radiator caused.”

I don't have the time or energy to do the research the 109’s cooling but here’s some cool (pun intended) data about the pesky little 109 I did find. Instead of beating up the devs … research it and present the data to the devs.

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...09g-14026.html

Last edited by BP_Tailspin; 10-31-2011 at 04:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.