This place never ceases to entertain me …
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502
i surprisingly just found out that the rads settings of the 109 have no impact on speed at all...
|
Should they have an impact on speed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502
normally i fly with them as much closed as possible, to avoid engine overheating, while maintaining the minimum air resistance...however i found out that one can leave the rads fully open and still reach and hold the top speed in level flight....
|
Keeping your 109 cool sounds good to me and without a performance hit is even better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502
that should be looked into by the devs,
|
I think there busy trying to make the “game” playable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502
cause i would assume that a fully opened radiator should cause enough surface to slow the aircraft down...
|
Key word here is “assume”
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502
i have to say that this fact is extremely disappointing,
|
Fact? Please quote your aeronautical engineering data.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502
as CEM and FMs are supposed to be the strengths of this game(sim?)
|
Key word here is “game” but maybe it’s more of a “sim” than we think. The P51 Mustang’s radiator has a low/no drag design.
“The duct for the radiator was designed to slow the incoming air down. The air could then absorb more heat from the radiator, but the radiator needed to be made larger because of the slower air velocity, which meant installation in the rear fuselage. After the air passed through the radiator, it expanded due to the heat and was accelerated out the back, producing some thrust to counter the drag the radiator caused.”
I don't have the time or energy to do the research the 109’s cooling but here’s some cool (pun intended) data about the pesky little 109 I did find. Instead of beating up the devs … research it and present the data to the devs.
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...09g-14026.html