![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That is range of cca 50 km/h. Do you think there was a Bf 109E-4 able to fly 525 km/h under citied circumstances?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Try be more real. I think 500 km/h is the highest sea level speed which could be achived by standart 109 E-3 with Db601 Aa engine and with 601A it could be even slowier ( ab. 490 km/h) with 1 minut emergency power. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It would be great to have actual variation in performance of certain type modelled in the sim. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
If you read the report, it says nothing about any of the data being converted to standard conditions. Therefore it is raw data for the atmospheric conditions given. Quote:
When you convert the performance to standard conditions, the results will be faster than the raw numbers in the report. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Including your Bf-109F.... So some Bf-109E's were just as fast as some Bf-109F's. On average though, the Bf-109F series was the faster airplane. Understand? |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Being an experienced pilot, multiple aircraft owner, and having graduated college with a degree in Aeronautical Science, I can decide for myself what is optimistic and what is not. Thanks! I don't feel the need to convince you one way or the other about it either. You can also decide for yourself. ![]() Last edited by Crumpp; 10-26-2011 at 05:18 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So it probably won't be atmostperic pressure at 0m then but rather MFP.
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Exactly my brother....
That French data does not appear to have been converted to standard conditions. They list the conditions though it won't be hard to convert. If someone else does not get around to it, I will do it later when I get home for you guys. |
![]() |
|
|