
09-19-2011, 10:04 PM
|
 |
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,286
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyBlonde
I agree.
There's evidence in the documented behavior of Hitler (losing faith in and complaining about the Luftwaffe after Dunkirk/BoB), Goering (making accusations of cowardice against his own fliers), the reassignments at OKL (Kesselring being shunted to the Med to provide token support for Italian failures) and the attitudes of German airmen (Typified by Adolf Galland's Squadron of Spitfires remarks).
Clearly the reassignment of strategic priorities relating to Operation Sealion was not without some sense of 'loss' attached to it. The fact that Germany was forced, by RAF resistance, to re-evaluate their strategic plan also provides evidence that a defeat occurred and caused a setback which was considered insurmountable in light of other strategic priorities. Then there is the cumulative effect which the loss of resources had on future operations which is hard to estimate in concrete terms but can't be disregarded.
All of that is common knowledge which requires no reference. Some of it is interpretative or subjective but, overall, enough circumstantial evidence is present to make a convincing case for the argument that Germany (and thereby the Luftwaffe) was defeated in the Battle of Britain.
Further supplements to this argument can be found by quoting the Luftwaffe personnel themselves.
Adolph Galland in reference to BoB, clearly he felt that something was at stake during the campaign.
General Werner Kreipe.
And by their operational orders.
The stated aim of Sealion:
Clearly not accomplished.
The stated aim of the Luftwaffe:
Clearly not accomplished.
As far as I am concerned the reality of history weighed against those stated strategic aims is more than enough proof that Germany lost the battle. Whatever back-pedalling the Nazis did to make things look more palatable, or whatever pillow humping the Propagandists of Whitehall did to make their triumph look conclusive, is irrelevant.
To conclude:
When you set out to do something you can either succeed or fail in your endeavor.
Those are the only two possible outcomes.
Being given cause to renege on your original course of action and adopt another indicates a realisation that your original desired outcome can not be achieved which is a failure in it's own right whether in the soundness of your plan or the method in which you implemented it.
Nazi Germany clearly stated their desire to subdue Britain by force and tasked the Luftwaffe with carrying out the initial stages of that plan. A determined attempt was made by the Luftwaffe to do so in which they failed which is proven by the fact that their objectives were not met.
This is, regardless of interpretation, and in any sense of the word, a defeat.
|
Right. So.....how did they cope with it?
__________________
|