![]() |
|
Pilot's Lounge Members meetup |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
From Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Britain GB Strength at the beginning of the conflict: 1,963 serviceable aircraft Germany strength at the beginning of the conflict: 2,550 serviceable aircraft. 544 aircrew killed 2,698 aircrew killed 422 aircrew wounded 967 captured 638 MIA bodies identified by British Authorities 1,547 aircraft destroyed 1,887 aircraft destroyed So Germany had more planes and lost slightly more, but in fact it proportionally lost less aircraft. The huge difference in terms of aircrew is because apart for the 109s, all attacking aircraft were multi-crew (the skilled crew members like pilots and navigators lost were in similar numbers of the ones lost by the RAF). As I mentioned before, it was attrition and it caused similar losses on both ends. Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The losses in experienced crews were the deciding factor. Basically the core of Luftwaffe veterans was depleted to a point which subsequent attrition never allowed full recovery from whereas, on the RAF side, they didn't have that many combat veterans to lose. Mainly the RAF lost inexperienced replacements with whom the British bought themselves time where they could probably withdrawn to the north and saved themselves the trouble since the Germans could not make a strategic impact on Britain by air power anyway, nor is it entirely convincing that they could have invaded in light of their entirely inferior naval strength and the logistical demands of such an undertaking. Also, 43,000 fatalities looks like a big number, well, it is a big number. However, in terms of bombing casualties during WW2, is isn't really that big. Civilian losses during many late war allied raids reached totals like that in less than a week, sometimes even in a single raid. Take Dresden for example, current estimates put the toll from that one night at 25,000 killed. Hamburg, 50,000, Pforzheim, 18,000. In Tokyo the largest casualty figure from a single conventional raid is estimated to have been 88,000 killed in one night during February 1945. (Figures all from Wiki for what it's worth) Destruction of civilian and industrial property is widely acknowledged as only having a marginal effect on the war effort by both sides, this is a well documented and incontrovertible fact. People can relocate, industry can go underground. Just look at German aircraft production figures in 1944. The combined weight of the sustained RAF and USAAF bombing campaigns made absolutely no dent in German industrial capacity at all in regards to aircraft production. Figures show that production actually steadily increased during the entire campaign as demand increased. Basically the allied plan to disrupt aircraft production in the Reich by bombing factories was a total failure in terms of their specified objective and it wasn't until ground forces secured those centers that production halted. The true success of their efforts came from the attrition of resistance and the depletion of strategic resources. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you guys still at it?
War's over, has been for a long time, remember the dead on all sides and the lives they never had. Don't try to rewrite history by arguing about what cannot be argued about. And how did the luftwaffe pilots cope with their defeat? Everyone differently in his own way. |
![]() |
|
|