![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: Would you be willing to pay for additional contend? | |||
yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
93 | 36.19% |
no |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
125 | 48.64% |
not sure |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 15.18% |
Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe NedLynch is an avid supporter judging from his posts. Muzzling anything that is not flattering doesn't help the community either. Good comms from the devs would sure help though.
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is in my mind the only viable business model for a sim such as CoD.
I for one would pay for aircrafts/grounds/sea objects. OTOH I think that missions or campains can be made by the comunity. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, I am an avid supporter, because I didn't listen to the whiners and people who are trying to run this game at minimum specs. Bought the game and it runs prefectly fine on my mid..ish system.
Since when do you guys play computer games? Since the dawn of recommended specs everyone knows you better be close to them or a good cut above them, don't even bother with your premanufactured, overpriced, bloatware filled and by default underperforming piece of compaq or dell or whatever manufacturer you bought it from. Sorry had to vent. To spell it out for those who still don't see the point behind this poll: dev team has revenue = continued development, dev team runs out of revenue = no more support for the game. This is just one idea to prevent that from happening, there may be others of course, all I wanted to see how the community stands in terms of continued support for the devs. Ok, even though the fewest people here seem to really read through a thread before posting, we all bought the game, we all spend the asking price either oblivious to the problem postings and reviews or in full concience of them. I fall into the latter category, in any case complaining you were ripped off is completely invalid. I did get what I payed for and am happy with it, of course I want more and, deveating from my original postion a bit, as multiple people stated, if made into a comprehensive package am willing to pay for that additional content as well. The cries for "first fix the game", they are fixing it, did you guys miss that? I am aiming for continued support not for the next month or two but for years to come. |
#64
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
fact.. flight sims are a very small part of the gaming market
fact.. flight sim users demand cutting edge graphics and high fidelity flight models (read realism), which does not come cheap wrt software development fact.. there is more money to be made and easier money to be made making 'silly' games (read non-flight sim games) fact.. Oleg's past flight sim spoiled a lot of people into thinking flight sims have to provide free support, updates and addons for 10+ years, when in fact this type of support is the exception not the rule in gaming. fact.. there is only three ways to get 'additional content' 1) closed system, where you pay the original sim maker for addons and hope for a free one from time to time 2) open system, where you pay for 3rd party addons and hope for a free one from time to time 3) hacked system: where you download a 'free' addons and hope for the best With that said.. I think the best way is option 1 Where there is only one methodology to the FM and DM, in that the other two methods can result in many different versions of the 'same plane', worse yet in option 3 you can end up with many different versions of the 'same game'. And as noted above, the flight sim community is a small (nitch) one realitive to the gaming community as a whole, thus any splits hurts everyone. Oh and the other nice thing about option one and even two is it has a filtering effect.. In essence weeding out the kid-os who have to go ask mama for the credit card to buy the addons. With the hope being that mama says no! ![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
fact.. many people who enjoy WWII flight sims are not computer literate and don't play other games. (you forgot one, Ace
![]() I get what you are saying, but I would like more people to play WWII flight sims, not less. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#67
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
![]() Quote:
It's entirely possible that some of your comments below are addressed to other people more than myself, but seeing as your post follows directly on from points I raised i think I need to respond. Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Blind faith? Maybe. Foolish? Probably, though again hindsight makes it obvious - it wasn't at all the case at the time. My choice and my responsibility and I take that one on the chin. Quote:
Quote:
I'm pleased that you and others can. In my own case I can't suspend my disappointment with the other aspects of the sim enough to want to put the effort into learning the technical details. I need to have a believable sense of reality from the visual aspects, AI and several other areas first. Please allow me the right to decide what is most important to me in how I play and approach the game without somehow being dismissed as a lightweight. Quote:
Feel free to move this post if needed.
__________________
i5-2500K @3.3GHz / 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 / Asus P8P67 / GTX-260 (216) / WD 500GB Samsung 22" 1680x1050 / Win7 64 Home Premium CH Combat Stick / CH Pro Throttle / Simped Rudder Pedals |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() If you mean like buy an aircraft like ROF. No I dont think so. Thats why WOW, ROF and some other games will never be on my harddrive. If that ever gona happen to this Sim, Im just one customer less. Does not mean much in the big picture, but there are many who feel like me. But addons like in the in the old IL2. shure.... Thats a full packed like Operation Arrowhead is to Arma2. No problem there. Thanks Last edited by Red Dragon-DK; 08-27-2011 at 10:13 PM. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
No, I don't think you 'get' what I am saying, that or you don't mind kid-os shooting down friendly planes in a coop because they think they are cool
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
![]() |
|
|