Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY - For 4.11

[Pursuivant]

Originally Posted by csThor

Well, we'd have to rewrite pretty much all the units in the game and the way markings are applied. We'd need to go over all the models and create new overlays and and and ... Quite frankly this is simply far too much work at this stage quite honestly 99% of the players would not even notice it.

That's what I thought. There are add-ons like Mat-Manager and the "Forgotten Countries" mod which sort of rework units and markings, but they're of indifferent quality. They add a lot of stuff, but some of it isn't well done. That said, I'd love to see national and unit markings of equivalent quality to those in Mat-Manager in the stock game.

That's not to say that DT has done nothing to improve the default national and unit markings. While it's never been an advertised feature in any of the patches, the new national markings for the U.S. and Japan look a lot better than used to.

[Pursuivant]

Originally Posted by SPITACE

hi can we see more british bombers in the sim for some night" rear gunner "missions we have got the me 110 allready in the sim to do it.

More flyable British bombers would be welcome. There's a mod effort afoot to get the Lancaster into the game, but I don't know its current status.

As for night gunner missions, the grim reality is that most British bomber crewmen never saw the nightfighter than killed them. The top scoring German nightfighter ace scored 121 victories; the top British tailgunner ace had 8. And, there were a lot more Luftwaffe nightfighter aces than there were RAF gunner aces.

Realistically, an RAF tailgunner mission would consist of 8-12 hours of constant vigilance, where your main tactic would be to scream at the pilot to "corkscrew" (i.e., go into a deep curving dive) to avoid being shot down. If you failed to see your enemy against the virtually black ground of blacked-out occupied Europe, suddenly, without warning, you'd find your plane engulfed in flames before you can fire a shot.

[Deliverator]

Hi guys!

I'd like to ask you to remove the limitations on the DeviceLink so we can export information to our X52pro MFD or other displays

[Artist]

And, if you at it :

Would you please, please make set()-keys available for the new "Multi-throttle/prop support and radiator axis" in DeviceLink?

Artist

[iMattheush]

Is the end of the month will be made ​​patch 4.11?

[Ace1staller]

We need more Japanese Bombers such as Ki-21 sallys and so on so we could make a campaign about the war in China.

[mcmmielli]

Nice request Ki-21 flyable + 1 for this...

[Bat*21]

I wouldn't mind being able to put AAA on the roofs of buildings or on bunkers.
Could this be done?

Also, catapult-launch option from battleships to simulate North Sea convoys or ship-launched recon planes.

[Ace1staller]

Originally Posted by mcmmielli

Nice request Ki-21 flyable + 1 for this...

Well yes the Ki-21 is a very good request but I didn't care if it was Flyable or not, it would be perfect for flying against the flying tigers or shooting it down as a flying Tiger, But mcmmilli, I still agree with you still that it should be flyable because it makes bomber pilots happy.

[Ace1staller]

Originally Posted by Bat*21

I wouldn't mind being able to put AAA on the roofs of buildings or on bunkers.
Could this be done?

Also, catapult-launch option from battleships to simulate North Sea convoys or ship-launched recon planes.

I like your request, but I'm not sure if its possible, but this request should be +1