Why fly the Spitfire?

[609_Huetz]

Originally Posted by TomcatViP

Ok guys why don't you accept that early war planes had used... early technologies.

I know I miss too my own board radar, my HUD and Helmet sight system but... CoD provide us with a unique sim depicting a very narrow windows of history where the line of history where written in bloods by a bunch of flyers.

Can't ppl stop crying after their lost ego (IL2 Ninja's) and accept the true balance of weapons.

If you hve some mental difficulties flying a two prop fighters or a plane that can only dominate its opponents by a very narrow margin after builing a Tac advantage, pls feel free to join the other side of the channel where lies the so called über.

I wld gladly fly your left hurry and Spit up to the glorious skies.

We alrdy hve lost a representative pitch setting on the 109 due to cte red whining. What 's lyes now ahead... ?

i am begging devs not to fall in the RoF syndrome : hold down the mast - don't give ears to the siren's singing !

Sorry, but spare us the "red/blue whining" threads. People in here are not asking for a uber Spit or a uber Hurri, just as much as they do not want a uber 109. The point is asking (and getting asap) historical performance for each and every single plane.

The Spit MkIs in the BoB had a CSP, model it! The Hurricane was not faster than the Spit IRL, model it! The 109's prop pitch was faster, model it!

Also, your attack against RoF is totally untrue and uncalled for.