Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-22-2011, 06:36 PM
jt_medina jt_medina is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 212
Default

Lasts ones, please don't hate me.
I really hope IL2 COD really becomes a great sim but it really needs a lot of work at least in the graphical terrain aspect.
I hope this thread will help people and developers to see what IL2 COD is lacking of.
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
The real thing.










Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-22-2011, 07:22 PM
biltongbru biltongbru is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 97
Default

Thanks for this effort Jt-medina: I think it gives some good substance to this thread Everyone can now decide for himself if some of the pictures looks a bit cartoonish.

Last edited by biltongbru; 05-22-2011 at 07:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-22-2011, 07:29 PM
DK-nme DK-nme is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 79
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jt_medina View Post
Lasts ones, please don't hate me.
I really hope IL2 COD really becomes a great sim but it really needs a lot of work at least in the graphical terrain aspect.
I hope this thread will help people and developers to see what IL2 COD is lacking of.
The real thing.


Tihi, I don't like all that green color - seems fake...


You are so right and like your picture examples clearly show, CloD has some serious gfx problems, that hopefully will be solved within reasonable time. The immersion has to be there (Am I the only one to find landscape graphics of CloD equal or just slightly better than the original il-2 gfx's?).
By the way, I flew over Berlin last week (in RL, that is) and did the same in WoP this morning. I have to say, I was baffled and astonished by how real and authentic that map seemed. The light settings and colors are almost perfect and from certain angles, it almost seem photorealistic - like being there again (and for real).
Also, the smoke colomns in WoP are far better and more realistic than those in CloD (hopefully something Luthier and team will change over time)...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-22-2011, 07:32 PM
Jatta Raso Jatta Raso is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 411
Default

*gasp* the vegetation in WoP looks strikingly realistic from medium-far range...

all in all i just hope the 1C team picks up some ideas to improve CoD on what can be done about the issues raised in this thread, it has become better already, i really noticed the better lightning in roads with the last fix, as their lack of definition was something i wasn't particularly pleased with... so with the potential CoD has shown, upgrading or tuning some graphics options is a must-be effort. i know there's a lot of features not seen waiting to be activated, like seashore waves, transparent water, flocks of seagulls, clouds and weather system, effective night light and so on... i see a long road ahead, i'm hoping the team takes this as constructive criticism and don't drop the ball on us (as not everyone come here to flood the threads with smileys)

Last edited by Jatta Raso; 05-22-2011 at 07:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-22-2011, 07:55 PM
RocketDog RocketDog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DK-nme View Post
You are so right and like your picture examples clearly show, CloD has some serious gfx problems, that hopefully will be solved within reasonable time. The immersion has to be there (Am I the only one to find landscape graphics of CloD equal or just slightly better than the original il-2 gfx's?).
There there is room for optimism because some of the fixes could be implemented quite quickly.

A huge improvement would come from simply replacing the lime-green trees with darker ones. Better still if a decent atmospheric haze could be introduced that made them look even darker in the distance. A further improvement would be to make the tree foliage come down a bit closer to the ground and hide the silver-grey tree trunks. In the photos of the real world (and in WoP, for that matter) tree trunks are hardly visible from the air and look very dark if they can be seen. Field colours should be fixable too, but it may need a texture artist to go over the terrain almost field by field.

I'm still rather surprised that they could have got such basic features of a real-world landscape so wrong. We've ended up with very nice 3D models (as good as RoF's) flying over a landscape that is arguably worse than many found in IL-2 1946.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-22-2011, 08:08 PM
biltongbru biltongbru is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 97
Default

Another aspect in the quest for realism with Clod is that vegetation is a dynamic entity and display movement with windy conditions. I can just imagine the enormous computing power needed for this; every tree leaf and every blade of grass; maybe not necessary at this stage?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-22-2011, 08:16 PM
jt_medina jt_medina is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RocketDog View Post
I'm still rather surprised that they could have got such basic features of a real-world landscape so wrong. We've ended up with very nice 3D models (as good as RoF's) flying over a landscape that is arguably worse than many found in IL-2 1946.
1000% agree.
I saw some pictures from 6 months ago and they looked way better than it looks right now.
I'll give you a few examples. Shots I kept on my harddrive.
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]


[/IMG]

People can say they look cartonish but I loved them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-22-2011, 09:02 PM
pupaxx pupaxx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Absurdistan - Rome
Posts: 344
Default

Hi guys,
in recent past I followed up for 50 pages an analogue discussion and I promised to myself to not get involved in wop_vs_Clod_landscape cause at the end its just matter of personal taste, judgement, it is difficult to bring someone else on your thinking or just share a minimum of objectivity...and so on....but I admit CloD landscape is the more intriguing key of this sim. And I pretend to be get 'involved' by a 2011 Sim...The overall looking 4me must be heavily tuned
I like so much WoP, especially the way WoP represent the landscape and how natural elements are merged together...(let go green filter issue and bla bla...)..
Having said that...
Me too I don't like too much the overall lime-green looking of CloD...it is not convincing but...I looked in my archive and I would like to share some picts taken in july 2008 at Duxford...lime-green is not so fanciful I say..look
DSC_0306.JPG
DSC_0665.JPG

The pict are for sure overexposed but hues are there! I well remember how much the grass green was reflected on the under surfaces of Airplanes; specially the spit with sky belly; even when they come at landing, at 5-6 meters of altitude, this green was so violent to enlight the under surfaces.
Look at the spit flyby..it was at 15 mt height..and look at the medium sea grey how much is influenced by the grass!



Cheers
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0661.JPG (46.4 KB, 23 views)

Last edited by pupaxx; 05-22-2011 at 09:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-22-2011, 09:10 PM
pupaxx pupaxx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Absurdistan - Rome
Posts: 344
Default

....another palette sample
DSC_0961.JPG

look at the trees..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-22-2011, 09:21 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

The thing which people are forgetting is the difference between the CloD and WoP terrains.
CloD has realistic 3-D trees (which look amazing up close, and not too bad from a distance (not focusing on colour here) whereas WoP uses trees which have a 2-D image which revolves as you move around them (very similar if not identical to Il-2's trees).
Indeed, WoP doesn't model 3-D/2-D grass, or indeed realisticall created buildings.

But this is one of the reasons why WoP is so easy to play over and FPS friendly. Indeed, RoF uses similar tree models to Il-2, and they work very well for flying.

So maybe, CloD was just being too ambitious, or the right intentions were there, it just wasn't pulled off correctly. I think the latter.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.