Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:26 PM
Rotanno Rotanno is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Default My two cents of latest developments

Dear fellow gamers

After following the latest news and discussion of the CoD release, I think the best course of action for Sturmovik series would be to quickly change the western publisher. Your involvement with ubisoft can only hurt the future of this great series as ubisoft has over and over again proved to be a very difficult partner and treated sims particularly badly (Silent Hunter V, CoD). They over and over again underestimate your customers and this latest upset is mindbogglingly stupid. How many potential customers will be lost because of this utterly stupid move?
It is extremely sad to see something that many people have worked for years to make and perfect, only to be kicked in the groin by the people who should be supporting them.
Developers, being very professional take the blame and try to downplay the publisher meddling in the development. But in my opinion this great game deserves better than this.
Hopefully CoD survives this and is the success it ought to be.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:31 PM
Chivas Chivas is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,769
Default

"Our game did cause Wide-Scale Epilepsy Failures when tested"

Yes thats UBI's fault....not.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:36 PM
Feuerfalke Feuerfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,350
Default

You'd better spend your 2 cents for a quick search on facts.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:44 PM
Rotanno Rotanno is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Default

Ubisoft is to blame to enforce their epilepsy program that is not required by law anywhere in the world to solve a problem that really does not exist in any meaningful numbers.
Epilepsy is naturally a terrible disease but only about 50 million people worldwide have epilepsy and most of these are very aware of their state and realize the dangers of playing games. So to use these measures to protect this tiny minority who choose to disregard all warnings can only be described as a publicity stunt.

"Our game did cause Wide-Scale Epilepsy Failures when tested"
And this has not been a problem for many years until ubisoft suddenly decided to made it such.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:49 PM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chivas View Post
"Our game did cause Wide-Scale Epilepsy Failures when tested"

Yes thats UBI's fault....not.
and who knows what is the real truth? (*wink!*)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2011, 10:55 PM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotanno View Post
"Our game did cause Wide-Scale Epilepsy Failures when tested"
And this has not been a problem for many years until ubisoft suddenly decided to made it such.
I think you'll find it has been a problem for many years, but the developers finally can test for the problem and decided they could do something about it. It's called being socially responsible.

Does this make the impact on the game in regards to frame rate drop not suck? No but it makes the reason for it and the measures that they have taken understandable.

I expect this sort of issue will become quite common in the near future as software companies realise their liability.

Just think, once the hardware companies like ATI and NVidia realise they too are partially responsible (for suppling the hardware that can trigger seizures) they may need to do this pixel by pixel comparison in hardware? At least it will be a global solution and possibly quicker. But think of the visual effects on games!

Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2011, 11:31 PM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

ill considered is the fact it is the timing of the flashes which cause the siezures.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2011, 11:57 PM
Meusli Meusli is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger View Post
I think you'll find it has been a problem for many years, but the developers finally can test for the problem and decided they could do something about it. It's called being socially responsible.

Does this make the impact on the game in regards to frame rate drop not suck? No but it makes the reason for it and the measures that they have taken understandable.

I expect this sort of issue will become quite common in the near future as software companies realise their liability.

Just think, once the hardware companies like ATI and NVidia realise they too are partially responsible (for suppling the hardware that can trigger seizures) they may need to do this pixel by pixel comparison in hardware? At least it will be a global solution and possibly quicker. But think of the visual effects on games!

Cheers!
This +1

We all know it sucks, but it is necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-26-2011, 11:59 PM
DayGlow DayGlow is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meusli View Post
This +1

We all know it sucks, but it is necessary.
So should all penut products be banned for the greater good?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-27-2011, 12:06 AM
major_setback's Avatar
major_setback major_setback is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lund Sweden
Posts: 1,415
Default

The reason Luthier gave for implementing the filter was not to prevent people from having seizures, but to stop people suing them.
So how do you best do that? That is the question to address, as it is the one posed by the creators.

I say :-
1) Post a great big warning on the opening screen.
2) Have the filter in place and active regardelss of the warning.
3) Put a disable option in the config file.
__________________
All CoD screenshots here:
http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/

__________


Flying online as Setback.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.