Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:07 PM
Trumper Trumper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 461
Default

In the UK if a TV programme or news report has flashing photography in it they give a verbal warning that it contains flash photography
Surely if they can broadcast live to millions all at once a sim/game is capable of issuing a warning so that anyone carrying on past the warning accepts responsibility of their own actions.
  #42  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:09 PM
RocketDog RocketDog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
Default

This is very disappointing news and does not inspire much confidence. What sort of FPS hit are we talking about? 2 FPS I can live with, if it's 10 FPS then this is a deal breaker.
  #43  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:12 PM
C_G C_G is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 95
Default

Thanks Thor....
I am so bummed by this.
Ridiculous, I know... it's just a game after all.
It seems to me that any program that had to compare each frame with the previous frame and make consequent graphical changes is going to be inherently resource intensive, no matter how well coded.

Sadly, the ambulance chancing lawyers win again...
Like others have suggested, I'd gladly sign a waiver- failing that one would think that making it a necessarily conscious choice to turn off the filter, once duly warned of the risk, would constitute an explicit acceptance of that risk.
[sigh] time to walk away from the 'puter and get some perspective, I suppose...
C_G
  #44  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:14 PM
=XIII=Shea =XIII=Shea is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 236
Default

Looks like back to faitefull il2:1946,So why doesnt dcs a-10 have this,a-10 has the blinding sunrays also,its total BS

Last edited by =XIII=Shea; 03-25-2011 at 04:30 PM.
  #45  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:16 PM
Voyager's Avatar
Voyager Voyager is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 164
Default

Well, from what Luthier is saying, Cliffs of Dover is less "Flash Photography" and more, "Japanese Seizure Bots".
  #46  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:16 PM
adonys adonys is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by luthier View Post
In summary, I want to stress that it is OUR code and OUR game engine that is causing performance issues. And it US who has to make it better, and that's exactly what we pledge to do.
This sounds like a poor damage control post.

IT states nothing we didn't knew already: of course that the code is Maddox, but is UBI that IMPOSED that code to be added to the game.

Quote:
Originally Posted by luthier View Post
We worked hard to address all these issues individually, but since a flight sim is all about fast-moving large objects, there were just too many instances of things causing high-contrast flashes.
We DO NOT want to have the 6 years hard working created engine/game teared to pieces in order to add this code, which will simply make it to not be a simulator anymore.

We need to have the game as it was made BEFORE this epilepsy thing, and every modification to it added in order to address the potential epilepsy issues, to be added as an option, ie, allowing normal people to play without it. It's sick to punish all the people just because it might hurt some which shouldn't/won't play this game anyway.

Regarding the necessity to avoid a lawsuit, it can be easily done how it was done hundered times before: IF the epilepsy warning is disabled from ini file, at the launch of the game, put up a mandatory pop up stating epilepsy care-bear code was deactivated, and any user entering the game does it on its own risk (the standard MMO EULA) and by pressing the ACCEPT button (which will be the only way to start the game). This mean no ordinary user can acceidentally start the game without the epilepsy filter code, as it needs to be manually added to the ini file, and even if will do it, being forced to press the Accept button in order to start the game means he was warned and knows about it, and chose to do it at his own risk. From law's point of view, this method is bullet proof (again, see all the MMO's legal part solutions).

All of the above IF this "epilepsy filter" excuse is true.. Because it very much looks like actually it isn't..

Do not seek further excuses on something which looks more and more as not being what is presented to be, but rather a smoke screen to hide the complete lack of optimization done on this engine, and the fact that it does NOT meet the reasonable gameplay experience on minimum settings/minimum requirements. Which, btw, can lead to real suits against UBI.

PS: I've pre-ordered a CE of this game, in order to help both UBI and Maddox and give my support for this game/genre. If UBI doesn't make this so called "filter" optional, I will cancel my pre-order, and I will look forward to buy a russian 1C release after all the optimisations to the engine are made.

Last edited by adonys; 03-25-2011 at 04:32 PM.
  #47  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:19 PM
T}{OR's Avatar
T}{OR T}{OR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 833
Default

@ adonys:

Spot on.
__________________

LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron
'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories
  #48  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:23 PM
House M.D. House M.D. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 38
Default

Guys, as long as this reasoning is true (and I do believe Ilya), you can't blame them and you can't ask them to offer it as an optional setting for the simple reason that not all epileptic people know their problem!

You can't ask them to risk this, because the person who might have the problem can be YOU!
And you may get it while being alone in your darklighted room and get all of the possible problems.

Just give them time to find a solution to this problem.

Let's wait and in the meantime...betatest the game!
  #49  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:24 PM
Kianoni Kianoni is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 56
Default

I still blame Yubisoft. it's them who are enforcing this in case someone who has peanut allergy buys a product with peanuts in it.
  #50  
Old 03-25-2011, 04:26 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by House M.D. View Post
Guys, as long as this reasoning is true (and I do believe Ilya), you can't blame them and you can't ask them to offer it as an optional setting for the simple reason that not all epileptic people know their problem!

You can't ask them to risk this, because the person who might have the problem can be YOU!
And you may get it while being alone in your darklighted room and get all of the possible problems.

Just give them time to find a solution to this problem.

Let's wait and in the meantime...betatest the game!
I wonder how i survived the past 35years - with all those flashy lights...

It just needs a waiver, end of story.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.