![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And which will have more players? And earn more? And, most importantly, allow its studio to develop the next game? As long as I can enable full real options in the game that are as realistic as possible what do I care what the newbs play?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
IIRC this feature already is in the CoD, it has been mentioned by luthier. Only you have to paint them yourself.
![]()
__________________
LEVEL BOMBING MANUAL v2.0 | Dedicated Bomber Squadron 'MUSTANG' - compilation of online air victories |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You just don't get it
![]() Options you suggest would be great, but developing those alongside fullreal would cause much more time and money. No offense, it is just different genre ![]() -m |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't agree with that at all. Combat flight simulators are funded by the Department of Defense, not gamers! I am really happy that they have built a realistic sim but remember it is a game and funded as such. Developing accessible ideas alongside fullreal will bring in more money.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You still don't get it
![]() There are simulators, and there are combat simulator games and there are just games. No sense to combine them all. Takes too much time and money. And yes, games sell more than combat simulator games. We all know that ![]() Aim for your market and make best possible product to your customers. You just can't please everyone, never, period. BTW: If my sisters 11 years old child started playing Il2 8 years ago and is still playing, I don't see why someone else could not. And he plays console games too ![]() Quote:
Last edited by Masi67; 03-24-2011 at 10:17 AM. |
![]() |
|
|