![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In preparation for SoW's almost certain release next year I've been thinking about getting a new stick to replace my old Sidewinder 2. If the new Thrustmaster Warthog stick had FFB I would seriously consider it, but right now I'm leaning toward the Logitech 940. I know the realism of FFB is debatable but I do like it and would prefer to have it offered on whatever I get.
What do you guys think? Any other recommendations? ________ Lm001 Last edited by Necrobaron; 04-26-2011 at 07:42 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have the G940, but don't use it because of the reversal bug. Apparanetly Logitech will soon have a fix.
I'm thinking of buying the Thrustmaster Warthog once their teething problems are fixed. There hasn't been a stick made yet as good as the MSFF2, but I keep looking. ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Loved my old x-52 pro
Currently loving my x-65 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
To not use the g940 because of the "reversal bug" reminds me of the fairy tale "princess on a pea".
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I, too, am thinking about the G940, and wondered about the validity of the "problem". Is it something that some people have experienced, or a global problem? If everybody is having the problem, and the G940 has been out for over a year, hasn't it been fixed by now? If not, why are people still buying it?
binky9 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Most people don't even notice the bug, because it is hardly noticeable. Most people would not notice it if they've never had a very accurate stick to base their opinion on. I didn't realize it was a reversal bug at first. I just found it took me slightly longer to get cross hairs on target with the G940 than the MSFF2. The problem is global, but Logitech apparently has a fix and its being beta tested as we speak. I would rate the G940 much higher than the X52, Cougar, and CH , but I've hardly used my G940, and I'm hearing rumbling of multiple failures. That said, I personally don't like the feel of CH sticks, but they last forever. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
have the g940:
stick: really good ergonomics, everything i nthe name of buttons and POV you need for il2. Very precise FFB: its tricky, some planes go really nice with it, others not so. Basicly, i believe that the g940 as a good firmware on force feedback, but il2 needs some improvements on this area. Throtle: not that ergonomic lots of buttons and 2 axis = all that i need and actually more than waht i use it as 8 buttons in the base, wich are kind of annying, becosue , unless you want ot drop your gear in flight, rest your arm at any time. Rudder: never used it. I have a saitek rudder. I only tried to put my feet on the g940 rudder and instantly i felt my masculine element being squezed in beetween my legs. Saitek rudder keeps everithing confortably safe down there. Overall for its price ( 280 euros ) it is cheaper than Cougar (200 euro w/o pedals) or Ch products ( total would be arround 300 euro). Overall its a good HOTAS, but if i had t obuy a new one im not 100% sure i would come back to this. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I love the feel of the Saitek single spring sticks like the old Cyborg Gold, they have all the same tension all around with no stop gaps. Now a days they seem to be awfully flimsy though and don't last . I have a Logitech Extreme 3D Pro now and hate it. It's reliable and built well but it's too stiff for my taste. I'd like to try a CH fighter stick and throttle to see how I like it. I already have pedals so I don't have to worry about those.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
.
Last edited by swiss; 12-10-2010 at 02:46 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
HOWEVER it is useful. If nothing else you have to be a total klutz to stall once FFB is set up right. I still use my old MSFFB2 (throttle only and elevator trim on my mouse wheel) so no idea what current FFB sticks are like. |
![]() |
|
|