Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 03-03-2010, 05:55 AM
Oleg Maddox Oleg Maddox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJB View Post
Maybe a simple tool to make possible to translate the whole text?
Can be two columns style, left column with text in english and right column to enter wanted translation...

Thank you very much Oleg, for maintain contact with users.

Sorry for my bad english, but I hope you can understand me.
I think we will have totally open texts in separate folders. Maybe not totally, but many. Anyone will be able to translate it.

Last edited by Oleg Maddox; 03-03-2010 at 07:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 03-03-2010, 05:58 AM
Oleg Maddox Oleg Maddox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorin View Post
A FREYA installation, for anyone interested.

This is one of the late variants. In 1940 such phased array antenna wasn't existed yet.
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 03-03-2010, 06:11 AM
Oleg Maddox Oleg Maddox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by major_setback View Post
I agree. A dedicated amateur with a passion for the game will give everything to reach his goal.

I don't do any game devolpment (other than hunting for reference materials for others), but I know from my own personal experience that I will put in 1000% effort, and go without sleep and meals for a hobby that I am passionate about. The pure pleasure of watching your own work (or a project you have taken some part in) near completion is all you need to keep going. My energy is endless for such a thing.

It would never be like this at a paid job, and I would never want it to.
There is other case... when hobby correponds to work. Then also maybe excellent result.... There is only one limit in this case ... funds and time ... this limit is some time very critical and stops some very good ideas or even decrease possible quality.
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 03-03-2010, 07:40 AM
AdMan AdMan is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oleg's ignore list
Posts: 247
Default

will I need a pilots license to play SOW?

I'm kind of getting that feeling
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 03-03-2010, 07:54 AM
Foo'bar Foo'bar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Niedersachsen, Deutschland
Posts: 662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Maddox View Post
There is other case... when hobby correponds to work. Then also maybe excellent result.... There is only one limit in this case ... funds and time ... this limit is some time very critical and stops some very good ideas or even decrease possible quality.
Only very few people have that luck...
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 03-03-2010, 08:04 AM
Oleg Maddox Oleg Maddox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foo'bar View Post
Only very few people have that luck...
Sure. One of them still me
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 03-03-2010, 08:09 AM
Oleg Maddox Oleg Maddox is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdMan View Post
will I need a pilots license to play SOW?

I'm kind of getting that feeling
I understand the joke...
Of course nothing can be perfect. We only try to tend to a limit...

But... we also remember about console and WoP players... so for them the sim will be also playable... But I'm sure - way more interesting in terms of long life use, learning, to be anxious for success. Very scalable difficulty setings will allow this.
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 03-03-2010, 10:20 AM
Abbeville-Boy Abbeville-Boy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 196
Default

I would like if the static camera view could be set to a certain degree such as S 180, good idea?
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 03-03-2010, 11:21 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

I think SoW will be a harsh reality check for many of us with full realism. No more slamming carelessly throttle to firewall without consequences etc. Fidelity in DM and FM unrivalled until now. Bringing back the challenge to online flying, the use of tactics instead of whiteknuckle endless furball..Oh yes, the good times are coming!


I think I should check my medication..
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 03-03-2010, 01:00 PM
MikkOwl MikkOwl is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oleg Maddox View Post
In device link we plan to give alsmot any information. And now we wouldn't limit it only for single play. I do think now that it was my little mistake to listen user's votes to prohibit it for online gameplay. To know G loading or to have separate normaly visible gauges on other panel isn't a cheat. We simply closed the development of some small industry around Il-2 in this case. it was really some mistake.
Not I think by other way. Experince of Il-2 gave me a lot of things to think .
I am working on getting the G940 throttle colored lights to work with IL-2. I already succeeded, and will soon release a version to support the G940 in IL-2. But it really sucks that some of the good information I need is blocked in multiplayer. I cannot make buttons light up if an engine is on or off, because devicelink won't even let me read such information in multiplayer. I cannot even know if the aircraft is airborne or standing still on the airfield.

If enabling this is a simple switch in the code, could you please let the Team Daidalos guys know that they should do it for the next patch they are working on? This way, you can also try out what the change can result in, ahead of SoW, and I can provide a bit more fun stuff for IL-2 for the community while Storm of War is still being worked on.

EDIT: I think I could possibly even improve the force feedback. If I read the airspeed, I could try to make a program to use the self-centering on the G940 (much tighter centering, and some damper type forces (a bit like hydrualic/wire resistance) become harder or looser with the airspeed, and set any threshhold. It would also fix the bug where FF is centering on the ground before take-off (only when lifting the tail a single time will the force feedback centering become normal).

EDIT: I can also make the AI crew speak a bit in multiplayer, and make it hard coded so that it only works in planes that have ALIVE crew members. A co-pilot can tell you your altitude, heading, radio beacon heading, and indicated air speed (fun when trying to bomb stuff, no longer 'alone'), they can freak out when pulling crazy maneuvers, they can tell you if you shot down someone or destroyed a target, and scream when they get injured or killed etc. This requires reading the logfile at the same time, but in combination it can bring some more realism and life to multiplayer without any chance of cheating.

Last edited by MikkOwl; 03-03-2010 at 01:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.