Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #381  
Old 05-05-2011, 03:27 AM
Lololopoulos Lololopoulos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Beijing, China; Columbus, OH
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heliocon View Post
Your comments are starting to get really sad...
I stopped reading his posts long ago. I'm quite impressed that he's been defending himself for that long, but his statements has became feeble and not very convincing anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #382  
Old 05-05-2011, 07:54 AM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

If you are done with bashing return to the topic please.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #383  
Old 05-05-2011, 12:42 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heliocon View Post
Your comments are starting to get really sad...
Coming from the guy who calls everyone a moron, that's pretty funny.
Reply With Quote
  #384  
Old 05-05-2011, 12:59 PM
GnigruH GnigruH is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Poland
Posts: 129
Default

Uhm... Just use ignore?
Anyways...
We have to remember that clodo was, is and will always be a low-budget game, with all consequences of that fact.
One of them being graphics not as good as it could be.

Vanilla il2 could get away with being a low-budget game 10 years ago, but times have changed. Games became much more complicated and nowadays if there's not enough money invested at a dev stage, the game will probably suck, unless it carries some revolutionary ideas, this one does not... or has incrediblye playability, this one does not have that either.

Last edited by GnigruH; 05-05-2011 at 01:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #385  
Old 05-05-2011, 01:04 PM
W0ef W0ef is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GnigruH View Post
Uhm... Just use ignore?
Anyways...
We have to remember that clodo was, is and will always be a low-budget game, with all consequences of that fact.
One of them being graphics not as good as it could be.

Vanilla il2 could get away with being a low-budget game 10 years ago, but times have changed. Games became much more complicated and nowadays if there's not enough money invested at a dev stage, the game will probably suck, unless it carries some revolutionary ideas, this one does not.
Erm, I would definetely not classify CoD as a low-budget game. Especially since they spent six years on development

I personally think the graphics look quite good though so I must be the odd one out, and yes, of course CoD also has repeats just like WoP does (look at the last screen I posted carefully and you should be able to see it).

Does that matter? Naw, not for me.

With further optimization hopefully more and more features will become unlocked to make it look and play better and better. (Can´t wait for the water with transparancy and a working surf myself which was hinted at).
Reply With Quote
  #386  
Old 05-05-2011, 01:23 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GnigruH View Post
One of them being graphics not as good as it could be.
Could you post some screenshots of the WW2 flight sim that you think CoD's graphics are "not as good as it could be"? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #387  
Old 05-05-2011, 03:11 PM
No145_Hatter No145_Hatter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 70
Default

Why anyone would care about Kent is beyond me.

Sussex is far superior.
Reply With Quote
  #388  
Old 05-05-2011, 04:00 PM
Mysticpuma's Avatar
Mysticpuma Mysticpuma is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bromsgrove, UK
Posts: 1,059
Default

Totally agree....especially when you can fly here:



Cheers, MP
__________________
http://i41.tinypic.com/2yjr679.png
Reply With Quote
  #389  
Old 05-05-2011, 04:17 PM
unreasonable unreasonable is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 101
Default

Where is "here" - it certainly is not Sussex!
Reply With Quote
  #390  
Old 05-05-2011, 04:18 PM
Langnasen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mysticpuma View Post
Totally agree....especially when you can fly here:



Cheers, MP
Looked and sounded crap.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.