Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst
Nobody else need to offer counter-evidence to your speculation, as you were not able to offer evidence to start with. The burden is proof is on you. You can't - I see you'd like to - escape from that fact I am afraid.
|
In other words what ever pitiful evidence Barbi thought he had, and has spent hours arguing over, even though he confessed to having only a
very passing interest in the RAF
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst
....Because I have only a very passing interest the RAF... Some times questions like this just solve themselves in time.
|
has been totally busted.
No Pips memo, which he has never seen in the first place;
Morgan and Shacklady busted; (pity I still like the book but some of their research lacks depth)
and his mere conjecture and wishful thinking over the words "certain" or "selected", written in memos that are 70 years old.
Not forgetting that Kf very recently did provide a document stating that the RAF actually considered it had adequate reserves of 100 octane fuel in November 1939.
All he can do is squeak "the burden of proof is on you" - and nobody but Kf has set that 'rule'. If that was really true everything Kf has posted, all of his bluster, all of his attempts to justify his position, has been, in the words of the bard "
a tale. Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing" (MacBeth)
03-16-2012, 08:10 AM
Threaded Mode