
10-21-2011, 06:56 PM
|
 |
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz
What you going on about you fool?
Prom? prom dress?... If it bothers you that much go away, people can bitch, moan, kick up, stress as mush as they like regardless of cost..get yer head out yer a$$
Judging by your reply to my last post you obviously have no clue what your going on about do you 'Ace'?
Again..a lil clue, SOOOOO this game has the right to print what it likes on the back of its cover because it has a 'future proof engine'?
I think your find that every other vid game's 'recommended' spec's will allow the user to play the game on settings more than f-kin MED!
You go on about and bash the whiners here... Please dont insult mine and everyone elses intelligence by saying the game was fine on release but 'we' should of had better hardware to play it on!
P.S Im more than aware of IL2 and what it was like on its release..and Yes it happened then too but 'that' does not warrant it happening again or justify it..
f*k me, you actually sound like your saying there were no bugs, nothing wrong with the code, nothing wrong with the engine and it all comes down to hardware and that we should of known that 'recommended' means MED-HIGH end rigs can only play this game on LOW-MED settings
tool
|
Yikes.. Looks like someone spilt some wine (or whine) on thier prom dress and can not return it for a refund
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
|