Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2011, 06:33 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Oh you can bet he will!

On that note.. Is it just me.. Or does there seem to be more to it than some of these whinners are letting on? I mean really.. All this over $50 for a game? Most of these guys sound like they spend $1,000+ on a prom dress and Oleg never showed up to take them to the prom.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Ah I see we have a IL-2 cherry in our midst
What you going on about you fool?

Prom? prom dress?... If it bothers you that much go away, people can bitch, moan, kick up, stress as mush as they like regardless of cost..get yer head out yer a$$

Judging by your reply to my last post you obviously have no clue what your going on about do you 'Ace'?

Again..a lil clue, SOOOOO this game has the right to print what it likes on the back of its cover because it has a 'future proof engine'?

I think your find that every other vid game's 'recommended' spec's will allow the user to play the game on settings more than f-kin MED!

You go on about and bash the whiners here... Please dont insult mine and everyone elses intelligence by saying the game was fine on release but 'we' should of had better hardware to play it on!

P.S Im more than aware of IL2 and what it was like on its release..and Yes it happened then too but 'that' does not warrant it happening again or justify it..

f*k me, you actually sound like your saying there were no bugs, nothing wrong with the code, nothing wrong with the engine and it all comes down to hardware and that we should of known that 'recommended' means MED-HIGH end rigs can only play this game on LOW-MED settings

tool

Last edited by Ze-Jamz; 10-21-2011 at 06:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2011, 06:56 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
What you going on about you fool?

Prom? prom dress?... If it bothers you that much go away, people can bitch, moan, kick up, stress as mush as they like regardless of cost..get yer head out yer a$$

Judging by your reply to my last post you obviously have no clue what your going on about do you 'Ace'?

Again..a lil clue, SOOOOO this game has the right to print what it likes on the back of its cover because it has a 'future proof engine'?

I think your find that every other vid game's 'recommended' spec's will allow the user to play the game on settings more than f-kin MED!

You go on about and bash the whiners here... Please dont insult mine and everyone elses intelligence by saying the game was fine on release but 'we' should of had better hardware to play it on!

P.S Im more than aware of IL2 and what it was like on its release..and Yes it happened then too but 'that' does not warrant it happening again or justify it..

f*k me, you actually sound like your saying there were no bugs, nothing wrong with the code, nothing wrong with the engine and it all comes down to hardware and that we should of known that 'recommended' means MED-HIGH end rigs can only play this game on LOW-MED settings

tool
Yikes.. Looks like someone spilt some wine (or whine) on thier prom dress and can not return it for a refund
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-21-2011, 07:07 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Yikes.. Looks like someone spilt some wine (or whine) on thier prom dress and can not return it for a refund
Just the reply I expected

ACE your such a Hero fella... as much as I hate the phrase i think its quite Abt here

'Whatever'

Last edited by Ze-Jamz; 10-21-2011 at 07:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-21-2011, 07:19 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
'Whatever'
I don't know what is funnier?

You getting your panties in a wad such that you invoked the 'whatever' reply

Or

You admitting that the progressing of CoD is the same as IL-2 was, i.e.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
P.S I'm more than aware of IL2 and what it was like on its release..and Yes it happened then too but 'that' does not warrant it happening again or justify it..
Did you act like a school girl who got stood up by Oleg on prom night than too?

If so, don't worry your pretty little head none! This is how most games go! Oleg will bring you flowers sooner than later! Just like he did with IL-2!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2011, 07:42 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
I don't know what is funnier?

You getting your panties in a wad such that you invoked the 'whatever' reply

Or

You admitting that the progressing of CoD is the same as IL-2 was, i.e.



Did you act like a school girl who got stood up by Oleg on prom night than too?

If so, don't worry your pretty little head none! This is how most games go! Oleg will bring you flowers sooner than later! Just like he did with IL-2!
You sad sad man...boy

Run along now you jobsworth t*t
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-21-2011, 08:29 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
You sad sad man...boy

Run along now you jobsworth t*t
So let me see if I understand you correctly..

You claim to understand that IL-2 went threw the same process that CoD is going through now

So far so good?

Than is it safe to assume that you also realize that most if not all new game releases go though a similar process?

Where by process I mean

most if not all games are released with bugs
most if not all games make changes
most if not all games have a lot of pre-release hype
etc.. etc..

Assuming that is the case (i.e. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt)

Why are you and people like you so upset?

Especially those who are familiar with 1C's IL-2 track record!!

A track record that consist of endless patches, add ons, and free updates for a game that is going on 10 years old

Yet..

You and people like you act like CoD was made by the makers of SILENT HUNTER 5.0

Where support for SH5 was dropped just a few months after the release

IMHO all this Oleg stood me up for the prom attitude would be well placed in the SH5 forums

But not here!

Granted I would cut those who are new to flight sims and never heard of IL-2 some slack on this

But you?

Someone who claims to know the history of IL-2!

Nope, and you and people like you should be ashamed of yourselves IMHO! Your not helping one bit and most likly making Luithers job much harder than it needs to be!

So in summary, I had a lot of worries about CoD early on, what with Oleg leaving and UBI's track record! My biggest fear being UBI would somehow force 1C to 'move on' and drop support for CoD like in the case of SH5. But what with Luther recent attempts to not only keep us informed but provide patches I am no longer worried and can see that the 1C approached to flight sims is still there, even if Oleg is not.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-21-2011, 08:33 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
So let me see if I understand you correctly..

You claim to understand that IL-2 went threw the same process that CoD is going through now

So far so good?

Than is it safe to assume that you also realize that most if not all new game releases go though a similar process?

Where by process I mean

most if not all games are released with bugs
most if not all games make changes
most if not all games have a lot of pre-release hype
etc.. etc..

Assuming that is the case (i.e. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt)

Why are you and people like you so upset?

Especially those who are familiar with 1C's IL-2 track record!!

A track record that consist of endless patches, add ons, and free updates for a game that is going on 10 years old

Yet..

You and people like you act like CoD was made by the makers of SILENT HUNTER 5.0

Where support for SH5 was dropped just a few months after the release

IMHO all this Oleg stood me up for the prom attitude would be well placed in the SH5 forums

But not here!

Granted I would cut those who are new to flight sims and never heard of IL-2 some slack on this

But you?

Someone who claims to know the history of IL-2!

Nope, and you and people like you should be ashamed of yourselves IMHO! Your not helping one bit and most likly making Luithers job much harder than it needs to be!

So in summary, I had a lot of worries about CoD early on, what with Oleg leaving and UBI's track record! My biggest fear being UBI would somehow force 1C to 'move on' and drop support for CoD like in the case of SH5. But what with Luther recent attempts to not only keep us informed but provide patches I am no longer worried and can see that the 1C approached to flight sims is still there, even if Oleg is not.
Don't feed the whining trolls!
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-21-2011, 09:02 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
So let me see if I understand you correctly..

You claim to understand that IL-2 went threw the same process that CoD is going through now

So far so good?

Than is it safe to assume that you also realize that most if not all new game releases go though a similar process?

Where by process I mean

most if not all games are released with bugs
most if not all games make changes
most if not all games have a lot of pre-release hype
etc.. etc..

Assuming that is the case (i.e. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt)

Why are you and people like you so upset?

Especially those who are familiar with 1C's IL-2 track record!!

A track record that consist of endless patches, add ons, and free updates for a game that is going on 10 years old

Yet..

You and people like you act like CoD was made by the makers of SILENT HUNTER 5.0

Where support for SH5 was dropped just a few months after the release

IMHO all this Oleg stood me up for the prom attitude would be well placed in the SH5 forums

But not here!

Granted I would cut those who are new to flight sims and never heard of IL-2 some slack on this

But you?

Someone who claims to know the history of IL-2!

Nope, and you and people like you should be ashamed of yourselves IMHO! Your not helping one bit and most likly making Luithers job much harder than it needs to be!

So in summary, I had a lot of worries about CoD early on, what with Oleg leaving and UBI's track record! My biggest fear being UBI would somehow force 1C to 'move on' and drop support for CoD like in the case of SH5. But what with Luther recent attempts to not only keep us informed but provide patches I am no longer worried and can see that the 1C approached to flight sims is still there, even if Oleg is not.
Lol, im not upset..check my previous 1000+ posts.. i love this game but i sit on the fence..

I just hate seeing fanbois like yourself bitching about people moaning claiming you know everything..your pathetic...also dont claim to know me either, that's bad for you..

I bitch as much as big this game up so get yer facts straight..

Someone take this guy away, lock him up and put a nice big poster of 1C above his bed so he can play with himself, obviously I mean in the gaming context, right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.