Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:12 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupo162 View Post
face it, you got owned. apologize and leave.
Ah, your missing the whole point

Not surprised really..

Allow me to bring you up to speed

CoD was not advertised (read promised) as a fully DX11 game

Therefore we have received everything that was advertised!

Which explains why the neg-nuts have NOT posted a link to their class action suit to get their $50 bucks back.. Because they have no case

Got it?
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:25 PM
Kongo-Otto's Avatar
Kongo-Otto Kongo-Otto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Augsburg, Germany
Posts: 391
Default

Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:40 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
Im sorry but you are wrong on this, read the whole thread its absoloutley all about CLOD, Oleg goes on to say that each tree will have a collision model. Oh and you insuled Oleg in the same thread saying his landscape looked like Shrek Island.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...251#post114251
Folks take note here what Tree is saying

In that it sheds light on his view of the world, and why he is so upset

Clearly Tree has no grasp on reality let alone the concept of how things can change during development and what is ultimately delivered.

As a guy who writes software I can tell you that a lot of things are 'tried' during development don't always make it into the final product. At the same time things you never thought about at the start of the project make their way into the final product.

This realistic view of the world is beyond most if not all of the neg-nuts in this forum

It is a real Dammed if you do, Dammed if you don't situation with these neg-nuts

For example, if you will recall during the past 6+ years of CoD development people were 'screaming' for updates on the status of CoD.

So Oleg was kind enough to post from time to time the status of CoD.

Now, years later these neg-nuts think that everything that Oleg ever commented on over the past 6+ year must be in the game otherwise they have been cheated.

Such that you got to ask yourself why Oleg says anything at all!

Well it is simple really

Oleg, like so many of us, realize that these neg-nuts are the minority. That their whinning temper tantrums are the exception to the rule and have no reflection on the majority of CoD users. Oh sure these neg-nuts are the squeakiest wheels in the room, which in turn tends to make their ant hill appears as a mountain to the new comers. But within a few weeks of hanging out in this forum even the new comers quickly see them for what they are.

So nothing to see here folks!

CoD is no different than any other software that is released

The difference between CoD unlike most games is still being supported by the developer and thus reciving bug fixxes

Granted it is not at the pace to appease the neg-nuts, but the good news is 1C is not catering to the minority
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.

Last edited by ACE-OF-ACES; 10-22-2011 at 04:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:51 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Folks take note here what Tree is saying

In that it sheds light on his view of the world, and why he is so upset

Clearly Tree has no grasp on reality let alone the concept of how things can change during development and what is ultimately delivered.

As a guy who writes software I can tell you that a lot of things are 'tried' during development don't always make it into the final product. At the same time things you never thought about at the start of the project make their way into the final product.

This realistic view of the world is beyond most if not all of the neg-nuts in this forum

It is a real Dammed if you do, Dammed if you don't situation with these neg-nuts

For example, if you will recall during the past 6+ years of CoD development people were 'screaming' for updates on the status of CoD.

So Oleg was kind enough to post from time to time the status of CoD.

Now, years later these neg-nuts think that everything that Oleg ever commented on over the past 6+ year must be in the game otherwise they have been cheated.

Such that you got to ask yourself why Oleg says anything at all!

Well it is simple really

Oleg, like so many of us, realize that these neg-nuts are the minority. That their whinning temper tantrums are the exception to the rule and have no reflection on the majority of CoD users. Oh sure these neg-nuts are the squeakiest wheels in the room, which in turn tends to make their ant hill appears as a mountain to the new comers. But within a few weeks of hanging out in this forum even the new comers quickly see them for what they are.

So nothing to see here folks!

CoD is no different than any other software that is released

The difference between CoD unlike most games is still being supported by the developer and thus reciving bug fixxes

Granted it is not at the pace to appease the neg-nuts, but the good news is 1C is not catering to the minority
Give it up now, you have been made to look like the complete TWAT that you are. Go and and wrap yourself up in your Oleg Maddox quilt and think about how you may intergrate better in future with real people instead of those in your virtual world.
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:53 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
Give it up now, you have been made to look like the complete TWAT that you are. Go and and wrap yourself up in your Oleg Maddox quilt and think about how you may intergrate better in future with real people instead of those in your virtual world.
Note again folks..

Not one rebuttal to anything I posted..

Why?

Because Tree knows I am right, and any attempt by him to try and spin what I posted will only highlight the fact that he's go nutting

Thus his only recourse is to resort to name calling
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:54 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Tree at his best....
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:58 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Ah, your missing the whole point

Not suprised really..

Allow me to bring you up to speed

(...)

Got it?
Yes, I got it!

You are frustrated with your life and need to jump here to defend some useless point of view in any topic you post.

Nothing new!
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 10-22-2011, 05:00 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
Yes, I got it!

You are frustrated with your life and need to jump here to defend some useless point of view in any topic you post.

Nothing new!
LOL! talk about coffie callin the kettle black!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 10-22-2011, 05:03 PM
Kodoss Kodoss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 262
Default

If you want DX11 so bad, then why don't you try?

Go to your Conf.ini file in your documents folder and change it from DX10_0 to
"DX11_1".

But I will garantee for nothing what might happen....
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 10-22-2011, 05:04 PM
pupo162 pupo162 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Ah, your missing the whole point

Not surprised really..

Allow me to bring you up to speed

CoD was not advertised (read promised) as a fully DX11 game

Therefore we have received everything that was advertised!

Which explains why the neg-nuts have NOT posted a link to their class action suit to get their $50 bucks back.. Because they have no case

Got it?

Well im assuming if planes in COD didnt had engines you would be fine with it. Nowhere luthier said "planes will have engines" he only said 20 flyables, he could be mining that if you drop them from altitude they would "fly".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.