why are political threads allowed

[raaaid]

5. Political and religious discussions are prohibited.

why people can engage in insane arguments like climate change denial into justificating petrochemical companies crimes against humanity and i cant post offtopic on realtivity falsness

[Specht]

I have an idea, I'll get a bunch of people stoned on different types of drugs, and get them to read raaaid's threads...

The results should be quite interesting.

[raaaid]

the rules are to be followed by ALL

this is not the natzis where those in power behave arbitrarily ignoring the rules

all right lock my threads for the sanity clause but lock those political as well,still ill keep on hiding the crazier parts, like i didnt learn to do that in real life

[arthursmedley]

Don't worry Raaaaid. If there was a sanity clause these boards would be empty.

[ATAG_Doc]

No one denies climate change - the sun rises in the east and sets i the west. But man can't change it nor prevent it.

And climate change isn't man made. You'll never ever ever be successful at making the connections that humans are connected.

It will do what it no matter what.

[raaaid]

I have an idea, I'll get a bunch of people stoned on different types of drugs, and get them to read raaaid's threads...

The results should be quite interesting.

as a matter of fact for the most part i dont read political threads, but since haters feel the urge to read my threads and attack me and i get infractions just for mentioning jesus since the different one will be hated i just expect the same rules that apply for me to apply to the rest

i admit i falll withing the sanity clasue but what about the no politics rule?

[raaaid]

No one denies climate change - the sun rises in the east and sets i the west. But man can't change it nor prevent it.

And climate change isn't man made. You'll never ever ever be successful at making the connections that humans are connected.

It will do what it no matter what.

i find that an ofensive comment, human made climate change denial is sponsored by the criminal petrochemical companies who are destroying the planet for a profit

saying man doesnt affect climate is like saying we should keep destroying the planet cause we live good not minding the future of our sons

it doesnt matter weather its true or not it matters that the people who avogue for it are implicitly saying we can keep destroying the planet as we have been

thats the obvious agenda climate changing denial has

[Warhound]

Raaaid, I don't think you should be silenced but you have to understand that your often incoherent writing/rambling annoys people sometimes.
You seem to be annoyed at manmade warming denial..now imagine if 5 threads about it were made daily and the offtopic section here was flooded with only that.

This is still a privately owned forum where the owners (and by proxy their mods) can ban anyone they dislike, no argumentation or reason needed. Thank god this isn't the case but keep getting on peoples nerves by trying to draw attention to yourself and fishing for reactions and who knows...
Solution is to make your own forum/blog, which is very easy these days, so you can say whatever you want to anyone who wants to listen. Ofc we both know your audience would be much much smaller and that's the opposite of what you crave.

Here's a vid to cheer you up though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmuzrHwMkMU&hd=1

[Robert]

raaaid's been around long enough (and some of his detractors have been around just as long) that most folks know raaaid and his ramblings. If they feel the need to read his posts, knowing how he writes, then there really is no excuse for for their negative actions. You either enter the conversation or you ignore him. Some bait, and make derrogatory comments instead.

People have to be responsible for their own actions. Blaming raaaid (or any other forum member) for them losing their cool is wrong.


Now wether the hosts have an issue with raaaid and consider his posts as spamming and need to do something is a different pair of socks.

[bongodriver]

I believe the existense of Twitter validates all of raaaid's detractors, if he just wants a place to spout crap all day then why doesn't he use a tool designed for 'exactly' that purpouse?......my guess is because he is scared it will give people a 'real' option to not see his garbage, I reckon the only time people ever get drawn into a raaaid post is when someone has replied and curiousity makes you want to see what was said.

[raaaid]

i admit i spout GOOD INTENDING ramblings

you spout hate speech and myself being different im the objective of the haters

bullying is as old as humanity and the victims alsways been the different people

what is being doing with me everywhere a person accpeted as totally harmless is not other than this, face it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGHzOJlC6eo

and again ill have to make another poll of weather i can continue posting off topic in the ot section or not

[bongodriver]

Why bother, we all know it's just another bit of attention seeking, looking for another excuse to carry on.

I still wan't to know why you just don't use Twitter? it really is a perfect platform for you, at least you will have the satisfaction of knowing anybody following you is actually interested and entetained by your ramblings.

[Warhound]

Why not make one(1!) thread titled "raaaids ideas and theories" or somesuch and post all the offtopic and irrelevant to CLOD stuff in there?

[raaaid]

yeah if i saty ill keep my ramblings to a single thread

[bongodriver]

No, believe me, the redaction was a problem for following your logic.

Also bad for your image, because you said you have a degree in english, and your careless writing was making appear you like a liar.

You look like a sensible person raaaid. Maybe you want to accept a suggestion from me.

You have both people that likes your post and people that doesn't like them at all. I think the last ones have nothing against you, simply they are not interested. But since you're one of the most prolific persons I know, your posts are all the way around and some find it like spamming that put down in the forum other threads.

What about keeping your offtopic posts in one thread? That would help you keep focused in one thing at a time, keeping all your thesis and theories together. I bet that thread would be always the top one, so practically, a sticky. And that would end all the complaints about you.

Cheers!

Yeah¡ thats fine this thread will do:

You go east following Earth rotation and Moon orbit

From a fixed frame, the sun, Earth rotates 28 times, Moon rotates 1 time and you rotate one time in your travel around the world, all with the same sense.

You can take yourself with Earth as a single thing that rotates 29 times, the 28 from earth plus your travel around the world

So then you substract 1 from moons orbit to this 29 figure

So in your travel around the world going east you count 28 moons

How many did they count in Greenwhich?

28 from earth rotation minus one from Moon translation= 27

Seems i had gone wrong

But the bomb in archeoastronomy is that Phileas Fogg in Travel around the world in 80 days counts one MORE sunset than in London and one LESS moonset than in London

What I am figuring now is how the ancient sailors obtained longitude with this knowledge with the simplest method, I would appreciate suggestions :)

Eulers solution took four hors to obtain longitude with the lunar distance method and though the wikipedia explains wrong the lunar distance method to obtain longitude i could bet its the same I say

yeah if i saty ill keep my ramblings to a single thread

You promised that before.

[ATAG_Doc]

Your doctors should be doing more to help you. I wish there was something I can do for you - really I do. I recommend asking them for 600mg of Eskalith. It will do wonders.