why i think the sky is a dome thoug probably im wrong

[raaaid]

ive seen lowest tide with the moon in the zenith

http://dolio.lh.net/~apw/astro/images/spring_tides.gif

ive seen the moon exactly in the midel of the cycle, halfmoon, offset with the sun 60º instead of 90 as it should being the sun so far away

ive measured earth radius obtaining 600 km radius by this method

http://wapedia.mobi/thumb/25d7510/en/fixed/470/423/Abu_Reyhan_Biruni-Earth_Circumference.svg?format=jpg

also moon eclipses cant posibly have such a defined border since shadows casted by distant objects are blured

think the shadow of a flying plane is so blured its invisible

for all this i calim the sky is a dome and the ancicients were right

am i crazy when i say a crazy think that i back up and still question farther with unsureness?

could we really be on inner earth?

something on this vain (/) where the / part is what has 600 km radius?


there are several references in songs and others:

the horizont is a black curtain says a song

the sun is a butane heater says a song

yellow sun is a kind of nuclear weapon

if the horizont is a wall i take a hammer and take it down says a song

the wall is a persistent theme in songs

if you check images from space in google

in 99.9 of the picture by google the sun is exactly above the photographer as you can tell by not there being half earth as thre is half moon

in other words why in 99.9 percent of google pictures on space walk the earth is not shadowed like this?

http://www.fpsoftlab.com/images/screenshots/earth-640x480-2.jpg

http://www.google.es/search?q=spacewalk&hl=es&prmd=imvns&source=lnms&tbm=isch&ei=Dij7TvLsK8yIhQe6xZGwAQ&sa=X&oi=mode_link&ct=mode&cd=2&sqi=2&ved=0CBoQ_AUoAQ&biw=770&bih=731

[winny]

The radius of the Earth is over 6000 Km not 600.

Nasa like to take photo's in the daytime, dunno why... maybe because then you can see what they're taking a picture of. And you're cherry picking, there are photos of the day/night boundary from nasa. Look harder.

Also if you'd look the shadow on the moon during an eclipse is nothing like clearly defined, it has a blur (again there are 100's of photons online that show this).

So yes, you probably are wrong.

[speculum jockey]

Go to a different doctor and show him the pills your regular doctor gives you. He'll tell you if you're taking too many or not enough. I'd give your a referral, but my work is at the opposite end of the crazy person.

[raaaid]

the sun from the moon has an angular size of 0.5º

so does the sun from earth

so the rim of the shadow seen from earth should have a size of 0.5º

i made a drawing on how eclipses should be if they were real

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/Imagen0021.jpg

compare it with this everpresent explanation on the net which you now know why its false:
http://www.astronomy.ie/eclipse2.jpg

also i verified myself that far away objects the shadow border its invisible:

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/umbra.jpg

edit:

and the pictures of space walk cherry picked to be the sun in the zenith in 99.9% of cases well...

check out here as well night never comes ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBL98p0wZ7g

so can i honestly be called crazy when i make full use of my reason?

in fact my conclusion answers deep and lasting questions

the thing is that the world is actually perfect but doesnt seem so since its staged

we dont even know what the real sky look like

edit:

this is interesting :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbtRvmvF2Jw